Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Intel
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Allegations by the European Union (2007β2023)==== In July 2007, the [[European Commission]] accused Intel of [[anti-competitive practices]], mostly against [[Advanced Micro Devices|AMD]].<ref name="Europa Memo July 27, 2007">{{cite news|title=Competition: Commission confirms sending of Statement of Objections to Intel |date=July 27, 2007 |url=http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/314& |work=Europa (web portal) |access-date=July 28, 2007}}</ref> The allegations, going back to 2003, include giving preferential prices to computer makers buying most or all of their [[microprocessor|chips]] from Intel, paying computer makers to delay or cancel the launch of products using AMD chips, and providing chips at below standard cost to governments and educational institutions.<ref name="Reuters July 27, 2007">{{cite news|first=David |last=Lawsky |title=UPDATE 4-EU says Intel tried to squeeze out Advanced Micro Devices |date=July 27, 2007 |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSL2783620520070727?sp=true |access-date=July 28, 2007}}</ref> Intel responded that the allegations were unfounded and instead qualified its market behavior as consumer-friendly.<ref name="Reuters July 27, 2007"/> General counsel [[Bruce Sewell]] responded that the commission had misunderstood some factual assumptions regarding pricing and manufacturing costs.<ref name="Reuters July 27, 2007 (2)">{{cite news|first=David |last=Lawsky |title=Intel says EU made errors in antitrust charges |date=July 27, 2007 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSL2788098920070727?sp=true |work=Reuters |access-date=July 28, 2007}}</ref> In February 2008, Intel announced that its office in Munich had been raided by [[European Union]] regulators. Intel reported that it was cooperating with investigators.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7241022.stm |date=February 12, 2008 |access-date=February 12, 2008 |work=BBC News |title=EU regulator raids Intel offices}}</ref> Intel faced a fine of up to 10% of its annual revenue if found guilty of stifling competition.<ref name="BBC Intel 2007-07-27">{{cite news|title=EU outlines Intel 'market abuse' |date=July 27, 2007 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6918975.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=July 28, 2007}}</ref> AMD subsequently launched a website promoting these allegations.<ref>{{Cite news |first=Peter |last=Clarke |title=AMD sets up website to tell "the truth about Intel" |date=August 8, 2007 |publisher=CMP Media LLC |url=http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201303681 |work=eetimes.com |access-date=August 9, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926220601/http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201303681 |archive-date=September 26, 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://breakfree.amd.com/en-us/default.aspx |title=AMD Break Free |access-date=August 9, 2007 |date=July 31, 2007 |work=breakfree.amd.com |publisher=Advanced Micro Devices, Inc |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070731232711/http://breakfree.amd.com/en-us/default.aspx |archive-date=July 31, 2007}}</ref> In June 2008, the EU filed new charges against Intel.<ref>{{cite news|title=EU files new competition charges against Intel|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKL1730607220080718 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081204062439/http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKL1730607220080718 |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 4, 2008 |work=Reuters |date=July 17, 2008|access-date=September 10, 2008 | first=Pete | last=Harrison}}</ref> In May 2009, the EU found that Intel had engaged in anti-competitive practices and subsequently fined Intel β¬1.06 billion (US$1.44 billion), a record amount. Intel was found to have paid companies, including [[Acer Inc.|Acer]], [[Dell]], [[Hewlett-Packard|HP]], [[Lenovo]] and [[NEC]],<ref name="fine">{{Cite news|url=http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1897913,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090516170330/http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1897913,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=May 16, 2009|title=The Chips Are Down: Intel's $1.45 billion Fine|date=May 13, 2009|magazine=TIME|access-date=May 13, 2009}}</ref> to exclusively use Intel chips in their products, and therefore harmed other, less successful companies including AMD.<ref name="fine" /><ref>[http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/745&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en "Antitrust: Commission imposes fine of β¬1.06 bn on Intel for abuse of dominant position; orders Intel to cease illegal practices", reference: IP/09/745, date: May 13, 2009]. Europa.eu (May 13, 2009). Retrieved July 8, 2011.</ref><ref>[[Neelie Kroes]], [http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/09/241&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en "Commission takes antitrust action against Intel", introductory remarks at press conference, Brussels, May 13, 2009]</ref> The European Commission said that Intel had deliberately acted to keep competitors out of the computer chip market and in doing so had made a "serious and sustained violation of the EU's antitrust rules".<ref name="fine" /> In addition to the fine, Intel was ordered by the commission to immediately cease all illegal practices.<ref name="fine" /> Intel has said that they will appeal against the commission's verdict. In June 2014, the General Court, which sits below the European Court of Justice, rejected the appeal.<ref name="fine" /> In 2022 the β¬1.06 billion fine was dropped, but was successively re-imposed in September 2023 as a β¬376.36 million fine.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_4570|title=Antitrust: Commission re-imposes β¬376.36 million fine on Intel for anticompetitive practices in the market for computer chips|website=ec.europa.eu|date=September 23, 2023|access-date=October 30, 2023|archive-date=October 24, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231024140302/https://Europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_4570|url-status=live}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Intel
(section)
Add topic