Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Triple-alpha process
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Discovery== The triple-alpha process is highly dependent on [[carbon-12]] and [[beryllium-8]] having resonances with slightly more energy than [[helium-4]]. Based on known resonances, by 1952 it seemed impossible for ordinary stars to produce carbon as well as any heavier element.<ref name="Kragh">Kragh, Helge (2010) When is a prediction anthropic? Fred Hoyle and the 7.65 MeV carbon resonance. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5332/</ref> Nuclear physicist [[William Alfred Fowler]] had noted the beryllium-8 resonance, and [[Edwin Salpeter]] had calculated the reaction rate for <sup>8</sup>Be, <sup>12</sup>C, and <sup>16</sup>O nucleosynthesis taking this resonance into account.<ref name="Salpeter">{{Cite journal | last=Salpeter | first=E. E. | title= Nuclear Reactions in Stars Without Hydrogen | journal=The Astrophysical Journal | date=1952| volume=115 | pages= 326–328 | doi=10.1086/145546 | bibcode=1952ApJ...115..326S}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last=Salpeter | first=E. E. | journal=Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. | date=2002| volume=40 | pages= 1–25 | doi=10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093901 | title=A Generalist Looks Back | bibcode=2002ARA&A..40....1S}}</ref> However, Salpeter calculated that red giants burned helium at temperatures of 2·10<sup>8</sup> K or higher, whereas other recent work hypothesized temperatures as low as 1.1·10<sup>8</sup> K for the core of a red giant. Salpeter's paper mentioned in passing the effects that unknown resonances in carbon-12 would have on his calculations, but the author never followed up on them. It was instead astrophysicist [[Fred Hoyle]] who, in 1953, used the abundance of carbon-12 in the universe as evidence for the existence of a carbon-12 resonance. The only way Hoyle could find that would produce an abundance of both carbon and oxygen was through a triple-alpha process with a carbon-12 resonance near 7.68 MeV, which would also eliminate the discrepancy in Salpeter's calculations.<ref name=Kragh/> Hoyle went to Fowler's lab at [[Caltech]] and said that there had to be a resonance of 7.68 MeV in the carbon-12 nucleus. (There had been reports of an excited state at about 7.5 MeV.<ref name=Kragh/>) Fred Hoyle's audacity in doing this is remarkable, and initially, the nuclear physicists in the lab were skeptical. Finally, a junior physicist, Ward Whaling, fresh from [[Rice University]], who was looking for a project decided to look for the resonance. Fowler permitted Whaling to use an old [[Van de Graaff generator]] that was not being used. Hoyle was back in Cambridge when Fowler's lab discovered a carbon-12 resonance near 7.65 MeV a few months later, validating his prediction. The nuclear physicists put Hoyle as first author on a paper delivered by Whaling at the summer meeting of the [[American Physical Society]]. A long and fruitful collaboration between Hoyle and Fowler soon followed, with Fowler even coming to Cambridge.<ref>''Fred Hoyle, A Life in Science'', Simon Mitton, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pages 205–209.</ref> The final reaction product lies in a 0+ state (spin 0 and positive parity). Since the [[Hoyle state]] was predicted to be either a 0+ or a 2+ state, electron–positron pairs or [[gamma ray]]s were expected to be seen. However, when experiments were carried out, the [[gamma emission]] reaction channel was not observed, and this meant the state must be a 0+ state. This state completely suppresses single gamma emission, since single gamma emission must carry away at least 1 [[angular momentum quantization|unit of angular momentum]]. [[Pair production]] from an excited 0+ state is possible because their combined spins (0) can couple to a reaction that has a change in angular momentum of 0.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cook |first1=CW |date=1957 |title=12B, 12C, and the Red Giants |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=107 |issue=2 |pages=508–515 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.107.508 |last2=Fowler |first2=W. |last3=Lauritsen |first3=C. |last4=Lauritsen |first4=T. |bibcode = 1957PhRv..107..508C }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Triple-alpha process
(section)
Add topic