Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sunk cost
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Overoptimistic probability bias === In 1968, Knox and Inkster<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1037/h0025528 | last1 = Knox | first1 = RE| last2 = Inkster | first2 = JA| year = 1968 | title = Postdecision dissonance at post time | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 8 | issue = 4| pages = 319β323 | pmid = 5645589 }}</ref> approached 141 [[Betting on horse racing|horse bettors]]: 72 of the people had just finished placing a $2.00 bet within the past 30 seconds, and 69 people were about to place a $2.00 bet in the next 30 seconds. Their hypothesis was that people who had just committed themselves to a course of action (betting $2.00) would reduce post-decision dissonance by believing more strongly than ever that they had picked a winner. Knox and Inkster asked the bettors to rate their horse's chances of winning on a 7-point scale. What they found was that people who were about to place a bet rated the chance that their horse would win at an average of 3.48 which corresponded to a "fair chance of winning" whereas people who had just finished betting gave an average rating of 4.81 which corresponded to a "good chance of winning". Their hypothesis was confirmed: after making a $2.00 commitment, people became more confident their bet would pay off. Knox and Inkster performed an ancillary test on the patrons of the horses themselves and managed (after normalization) to repeat their finding almost identically. Other researchers have also found evidence of inflated probability estimations.<ref name="Arkes and Blumer">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 | last1 = Arkes | first1 = Hal | last2 = Blumer | first2 = Catherine | year = 1985 | title = The Psychology of Sunk Cost | journal = Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes | volume = 35 | pages = 124β140 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3<295::AID-BDM353>3.0.CO;2-6 | last1 = Arkes | first1 = Hal | last2 = Hutzel | first2 = Laura | year = 2000 | title = The Role of Probability of Success Estimates in the Sunk Cost Effect | journal = Journal of Behavioral Decision Making | volume = 13 | issue = 3| pages = 295β306 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sunk cost
(section)
Add topic