Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Stephen Breyer
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Census=== In ''[[Department of Commerce v. New York]]'' (2019), Breyer was in the 5β4 majority that ruled that the Census Bureau had not followed proper procedure in its implementation of a citizenship question. He was also one of four justices who would have held the citizenship question unconstitutional in itself. In a mostly concurring opinion, he wrote: "Yet the decision was ill considered in a number of critically important respects. The Secretary did not give adequate consideration to issues that should have been central to his judgment, such as the high likelihood of an undercount, the low likelihood that a question would yield more accurate citizenship data, and the apparent lack of any need for more accurate citizenship data to begin with. The Secretary's failures in considering those critical issues make his decision unreasonable".<ref>{{Cite web |date=June 27, 2019 |title=Department of Commerce v. New York |url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-966_bq7c.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200823075819/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-966_bq7c.pdf |archive-date=August 23, 2020 |access-date=May 22, 2021 |website=supremecourt.gov}}</ref> On December 18, 2020, Breyer was one of three dissenters in ''[[Trump v. New York]]''. In a 20-page dissent, he argued that the Court should not have sidestepped the case and should have ruled in favor of the challengers, who wanted the Court to block the Trump administration's last-minute attempts to exclude undocumented immigrants from the census.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 18, 2020 |title=Trump v. New York |url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-366_7647.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210428190828/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-366_7647.pdf |archive-date=April 28, 2021 |access-date=May 22, 2021 |website=supremecourt.gov}}</ref> The census ultimately did not exclude undocumented immigrants, due to a lack of time and the subsequent issuance of [[Executive Order 13986]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Stephen Breyer
(section)
Add topic