Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Siméon Denis Poisson
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Optics === [[File:A_photograph_of_the_Arago_spot.png|thumb|right|200px|Photo of the Arago spot in a shadow of a 5.8 mm circular obstacle.]] Poisson was a member of the academic "old guard" at the [[French Academy of Sciences|Académie royale des sciences de l'Institut de France]], who were staunch believers in the [[Wave–particle duality|particle theory of light]] and were skeptical of its alternative, the wave theory. In 1818, the Académie set the topic of their prize as [[diffraction]]. One of the participants, civil engineer and opticist [[Augustin-Jean Fresnel]] submitted a thesis explaining diffraction derived from analysis of both the [[Huygens–Fresnel principle]] and [[Young's double slit experiment]].<ref name="fresnel1868">{{Citation|last=Fresnel|first=A.J.|title=OEuvres Completes 1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3QgAAAAAMAAJ|year=1868|publication-place=Paris|publisher=Imprimerie impériale}}</ref> Poisson studied Fresnel's theory in detail and looked for a way to prove it wrong. Poisson thought that he had found a flaw when he demonstrated that Fresnel's theory predicts an on-axis bright spot in the shadow of a circular obstacle blocking a [[point source]] of light, where the particle-theory of light predicts complete darkness. Poisson argued this was absurd and Fresnel's model was wrong. (Such a spot is not easily observed in everyday situations, because most everyday sources of light are not good point sources.) The head of the committee, [[François Arago|Dominique-François-Jean Arago]], performed the experiment. He molded a 2 mm metallic disk to a glass plate with wax.<ref name="fresnel1868_arago">{{Citation|last=Fresnel|first=A.J.|title=OEuvres Completes 1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3QgAAAAAMAAJ|page=369|year=1868|publication-place=Paris|publisher=Imprimerie impériale}}</ref> To everyone's surprise he observed the predicted bright spot, which vindicated the wave model. Fresnel won the competition. After that, the corpuscular theory of light was dead, but was revived in the twentieth century in a different form, [[wave-particle duality]]. Arago later noted that the diffraction bright spot (which later became known as both the [[Arago spot]] and the Poisson spot) had already been observed by [[Joseph-Nicolas Delisle]]<ref name="fresnel1868_arago" /> and [[Giacomo F. Maraldi]]<ref name="maraldi1723">{{Citation|last=Maraldi|first=G.F.|title='Diverses expèriences d'optique' in Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences|url=http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3592w/f300.image.langFR|page=111|year=1723|publisher=Imprimerie impériale}}</ref> a century earlier.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Siméon Denis Poisson
(section)
Add topic