Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Problem of universals
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Medieval realism=== {{main|Medieval realism}} Boethius mostly stayed close to Aristotle in his thinking about universals. Realism's biggest proponents in the Middle Ages, however, came to be [[Thomas Aquinas]] and [[Duns Scotus]]. Aquinas argued that both the essence of a thing and its existence were clearly distinct;<ref>On Being and Essence, Ch I.</ref> in this regard he is also Aristotelian. Duns Scotus argues that in a thing there is no real distinction between the essence and the existence; instead, there is only a [[formal distinction]].<ref>Opus Oxoniense I iii 1-2</ref> Scotus believed that universals exist only inside the things that they exemplify, and that they "contract" with the [[haecceity]] of the thing to create the individual. As a result of his realist position, he argued strongly against both nominalism and conceptualism, arguing instead for [[Scotist realism]], a medieval response to the [[conceptualism]] of [[Peter Abelard|Abelard]]. That is to say, Scotus believed that such properties as 'redness' and 'roundness' exist in reality and are mind-independent entities. Furthermore, Duns Scotus wrote about this problem in his own commentary (''Quaestiones'') on Porphyry's ''Isagoge'', as Boethius had done. Scotus was interested in how the mind forms universals, and he believed this to be 'caused by the intellect'.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Scotus |first1=Duns |title=Quaestiones in librum Porphyrii Isagoge |pages=q. 4 proemium}}</ref> This intellect acts on the basis that the nature of, say, 'humanity' that is found in other humans and also that the quality is attributable to other individual humans.<ref>{{cite book |last=Noone |first=Timothy B. |editor-last=Williams |editor-first=Thomas |title=The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani00will |url-access=limited |publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=2003 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani00will/page/n117 100]β129 |chapter=Universals and Individuation |isbn=978-0-521-63563-9}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Problem of universals
(section)
Add topic