Editing Morality (section)

=== Morality with practical reasoning ===
Practical reason is necessary for the moral agency but it is not a sufficient condition for moral agency.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ezedike |first=Edward Uzoma |date=2020-01-02 |title=Morality within the limits of practical reason: a critique of Kant's concept of moral virtue |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-11-2018-0171 |journal=International Journal of Ethics and Systems |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=205–216 |doi=10.1108/ijoes-11-2018-0171 |issn=2514-9369 |s2cid=214501283}}</ref> Real life issues that need solutions do need both rationality and emotion to be sufficiently moral. One uses rationality as a pathway to the ultimate decision, but the environment and emotions towards the environment at the moment must be a factor for the result to be truly moral, as morality is subject to culture. Something can only be morally acceptable if the culture as a whole has accepted this to be true. Both practical reason and relevant emotional factors are acknowledged as significant in determining the morality of a decision.<ref>{{Citation |last=Richardson |first=Henry S. |title=Moral Reasoning |date=2018 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/reasoning-moral/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Fall 2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2022-05-04}}</ref>{{POV statement|date=April 2021}}