Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Medical uses of silver
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Catheters=== A 2014 systemic review concluded that using silver alloy-coated catheters showed no significant difference in incidences of symptomatic Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) versus using standard catheters, although silver-alloy catheters seemed to cause less discomfort to patients.<ref name=pmid25248140>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lam TB, Omar MI, Fisher E, Gillies K, MacLennan S | title = Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 9 | pages = CD004013 | date = September 2014 | pmid = 25248140 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD004013.pub4 | pmc = 11197149 }}</ref> These catheters are associated with greater cost than other catheters.<ref name=pmid25248140/> A 2014 Multicenter Cohort Study found that using a silver-alloy hydrogel urinary catheter did reduce symptomatic Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) occurrences as defined by both NHSN and clinical criteria.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> A 2011 critical analysis of eight studies found a consistent pattern which supported using silver-alloy urinary catheters over uncoated catheters to reduce infections in adult patients, and concluded that using silver-alloy catheters would significantly improve patient care.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> A 2007 systemic review concluded that using silver-alloy indwelling catheters for short-term catheterizing will reduce the risk of catheter-acquired urinary tract infection, but called for further studies to evaluate the economic benefits of using the expensive silver alloy-catheters.<ref name="ReferenceC"/> Two systemic reviews in 2004 found that using silver-alloy catheters reduced asymptomatic and symptomatic bacteriuria more than standard catheters, for patients who were catheterised for a short time.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rosier PK | title = Review: silver alloy catheters are more effective than standard catheters for reducing bacteriuria in adults in hospital having short term catheterisation | journal = Evidence-Based Nursing | volume = 7 | issue = 3 | pages = 85 | date = July 2004 | pmid = 15252913 | doi = 10.1136/ebn.7.3.85 | s2cid = 35670327 | url = http://ebn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/7/3/85 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A 2000 randomized crossover study found that using the more expensive silver-coated catheter may result in cost savings by preventing nosocomial UTI infections,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Karchmer TB, Giannetta ET, Muto CA, Strain BA, Farr BM | title = A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients | journal = Archives of Internal Medicine | volume = 160 | issue = 21 | pages = 3294β3298 | date = November 2000 | pmid = 11088092 | doi = 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3294 | doi-access = free }}</ref> and another 2000 study found that using silver alloy catheters for short-term urinary catheterization reduces the incidence of symptomatic UTI and bacteremia compared with standard catheters, and may thus yield cost savings.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Saint S, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD, Chenoweth C, Fendrick AM | title = The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection | journal = Archives of Internal Medicine | volume = 160 | issue = 17 | pages = 2670β2675 | date = September 2000 | pmid = 10999983 | doi = 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2670 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A 2017 study found that a combination of [[chlorhexidine]] and silver-sulfadiazine (CSS) used to coat [[central venous catheters]] (CVC) reduces the rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections.<ref name=pmid28534703>{{cite journal | vauthors = Choi YJ, Lim JK, Park JJ, Huh H, Kim DJ, Gong CH, Yoon SZ | title = Chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coating on central venous catheters is not sufficient for protection against catheter-related infection: Simulation-based laboratory research with clinical validation | journal = The Journal of International Medical Research | volume = 45 | issue = 3 | pages = 1042β1053 | date = June 2017 | pmid = 28534703 | pmc = 5536400 | doi = 10.1177/0300060517708944 }}</ref> However, they also found that the efficacy of the CSS-CVC coating was progressively eroded by blood-flow, and that the antibacterial function was lost after 48 hours.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Medical uses of silver
(section)
Add topic