Editing Lewis Binford (section)

==Influence==
Binford is mainly known for his contributions to [[archaeological theory]] and his promotion of [[Ethnoarchaeology|ethnoarchaeological research]].  As a leading advocate of the "New Archaeology" movement of the 1960s, he proposed a number of ideas that became central to [[processual archaeology]].  Binford and other New Archaeologists argued that there should be a greater application of scientific methodologies and the [[hypothetico-deductive method]] in archaeology.  He placed a strong emphasis on generalities and the way in which human beings interact with their ecological niche, defining culture as the extrasomatic means of adaptation. This view reflects the influence of his Ph.D supervisor, [[Leslie White]]. Binford's work can largely be seen as a reaction to the earlier [[Culture-historical archaeology|culture history]] approach to archaeology. New Archaeology was considered a revolution in archaeological theory.

Binford was involved in several high-profile debates including arguments with [[James Sackett]] on the nature and function of style and on symbolism and methodology with [[Ian Hodder]].  Binford has spoken out and reacted to a number of schools of thought, particularly the [[Post-processual archaeology|post-processual]] school, the behavioural school, and symbolic and postmodern anthropologies. Binford was also known for a friendlier rivalry with French archaeologist [[François Bordes]], with whom he argued over the interpretation of [[Mousterian]] sites. Binford's disagreement with Bordes over the interpretation of Mousterian stone artifacts provided the impetus for much of Binford's theoretical work. Bordes interpreted variability in Mousterian assemblages as evidence of different tribes, while Binford felt that a functional interpretation of the different assemblages would be more appropriate. His subsequent inability to explain the Mousterian facies using a functional approach led to his ethnoarchaeological work among the [[Nunamiut]] and the development of his [[Middle-range theory (archaeology)|middle-range theory]].