Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Josephus on Jesus
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Three perspectives on authenticity === [[File:Flavius Josephus 1582 by Froben.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|''The Complete Works of Josephus'', 1582]] [[Paul L. Maier]] and Zvi Baras state that there are three possible perspectives on the authenticity of the ''{{lang|la|Testimonium}}'': # It is entirely authentic. # It is entirely a Christian forgery. # It has authentic material about Jesus, but Christian interpolations exist in some parts.{{sfn|Maier|2007|pp=336β337}}{{sfn|Baras|1987|p=339}} Paul Maier states that the first case is generally seen as hopeless given that as a Jew, Josephus would not have claimed Jesus as the Messiah, and that the second option is hardly tenable given the presence of the passage in all extant Greek manuscripts; thus a large majority of modern scholars accept partial authenticity.{{sfn|Maier|2007|pp=336β337}} Baras adds that partial authenticity is more plausible because it accepts parts of the passage as genuine, but discounts other parts as interpolations.{{sfn|Baras|1987|p=339}} [[Craig A. Evans]] (and separately [[Robert E. Van Voorst]]) state that most modern scholars accept the position that the ''{{lang|la|Testimonium}}'' is partially authentic, had a kernel with an authentic reference to Jesus, and that the analysis of its content and style support this conclusion.{{sfn|Evans|2001|p=43}}{{sfn|Van Voorst|2003|pp=509β511}} While before the advent of [[literary criticism]] most scholars considered the ''{{lang|la|Testimonium}}'' entirely authentic, thereafter the number of supporters of full authenticity declined.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|pp=89β90}} Most scholars now accept partial authenticity and many attempt to reconstruct their own version of the authentic kernel, and scholars such as [[GΓ©za Vermes]] have argued that the overall characterizations of Jesus in the ''{{lang|la|Testimonium}}'' are in accord with the style and approach of Josephus.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|pp=89β90}}<ref name=Henry185>''Jesus and the oral Gospel tradition'' by Henry Wansbrough 2004 {{ISBN|0-567-04090-9}} p. 185</ref><ref>''The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown: An Introduction to the New Testament'' by Andreas J. Kostenberger, L. Scott Kellum and Charles L Quarles 2009 {{ISBN|0-8054-4365-7}} pp. 104β108</ref><ref name=Geza35 /><ref>''Jesus and His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies'' by Craig A. Evans 2001 {{ISBN|0-391-04118-5}} p. 316</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Josephus on Jesus
(section)
Add topic