Editing Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (section)

== Writings ==
{{More citations needed|section|date=September 2022}}
{{Neoplatonism}}
In the ''Oratio de hominis dignitate'' (''Oration on the Dignity of Man'', 1486), Pico justified the importance of the human quest for knowledge, masterfully blending [[Neoplatonism]] and Aristotelian [[Scholasticism]].<ref>[https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/pico-della-mirandola-oration-on-the-dignity-of-man-a-new-translation-and-commentary/term= Pico della Mirandola: Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation and Commentary]. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Accessed 3 November 2024.</ref>

The ''Oration'' also served as an introduction to Pico's 900 theses, which he believed to provide a complete and sufficient basis for the discovery of all knowledge, and hence a model for mankind's ascent of the chain of being. The 900 Theses are a good example of humanist syncretism, because Pico combined [[Platonism]], Neoplatonism, Aristotelianism, [[Hermeticism]] and Kabbalah. They also included 72 theses describing what Pico believed to be a complete system of physics.

Pico's ''De animae immortalitate'' (Paris, 1541), and other works, developed the doctrine that man's possession of an [[immortal soul]] freed him from the hierarchical stasis. Pico believed in [[universal reconciliation]], as one of his 900 theses was {{qi|A mortal sin of finite duration is not deserving of eternal but only of temporal punishment;}} it was among the theses pronounced heretical by Pope Innocent VIII in his bull of 4 August 1487.<ref>"[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.html?term=Apocatastasis Apocatastasis]". ''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Vol. I''.</ref>

In the ''Oration'' he argues, in the words of [[Pier Cesare Bori]], that {{qi|human vocation is a mystical vocation that has to be realized following a three-stage way, which comprehends necessarily moral transformation, intellectual research and final perfection in the identity with the absolute reality. This paradigm is universal, because it can be retraced in every tradition.}}<ref>Prof. Pier Cesare Bori. "[http://didattica.spbo.unibo.it/pais/bori/articolo010.html The Italian Renaissance: An Unfinished Dawn?: Pico della Mirandola] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071229231307/http://didattica.spbo.unibo.it/pais/bori/articolo010.html |date=29 December 2007 }}". Accessed 5 December 2007.</ref>

A portion of his ''Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem'' was published in Bologna after his death. In this book, Pico presents arguments against the practice of [[astrology]] that have had enormous resonance for centuries, up to our own time. ''Disputationes'' is influenced by the arguments against astrology espoused by one of his intellectual heroes, [[Augustine of Hippo]], and also by the medieval philosophical tale [[Hayy ibn Yaqdhan|''Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān'']] by [[ibn Tufail]], which promoted [[autodidacticism]] as a philosophical program.<ref>see Ben-Zaken, Avner, "Defying Authority, Rejecting Predestination and Conquering Nature", in ''[https://www.amazon.com/dp/0801897394/ref=rdr_ext_tmb Reading Hayy Ibn-Yaqzan: A Cross-Cultural History of Autodidacticism]'' (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011), pp. 65–100.</ref>

Pico's antagonism to astrology seems to derive mainly from the conflict of astrology with Christian notions of free will. But Pico's arguments moved beyond the objections of Ficino, who was himself an astrologer. The manuscript was edited for publication after Pico's death by his nephew [[Giovanni Francesco Pico della Mirandola]], an ardent follower of Savonarola, and may possibly have been amended to be more forcefully critical. This might possibly explain the fact that Ficino championed the manuscript and enthusiastically endorsed it before its publication.

Early in his career, Pico wrote a ''Commento sopra una canzone d'amore di Girolamo Benivieni'', in which he revealed his plan to write a book entitled ''Poetica Theologia'':<ref>Butorac, pg. 357</ref>
{{quote | It was the opinion of the ancient theologians that divine subjects and the secret Mysteries must not be rashly divulged... the Egyptians had sculpted sphinxes in all their temples, for no other reason than to indicate that divine things, even when they are committed to writing, must be covered with enigmatic veils and poetic dissimulation... How that was done... by Latin and Greek poets we shall explain in the book of our Poetic Theology. | ''Commento'', Libro Terzo, Cap. xi, Stanza Nona<ref>Hanegraaff, pg. 64</ref> }}

Pico's ''Heptaplus'', a mystical-allegorical exposition of the [[Genesis creation narrative|creation]] according to the seven Biblical senses, elaborates on his idea that different religions and traditions describe the same God. The book is written in his characteristic [[Christian apologetics|apologetic]] and polemic style:{{quote | If they agree with us anywhere, we shall order the Hebrews to stand by the ancient traditions of their fathers; if anywhere they disagree, then drawn up in Catholic legions we shall make an attack upon them. In short, whatever we detect foreign to the truth of the Gospels we shall refute to the extent of our power, while whatever we find holy and true we shall bear off from the synagogue, as from a wrongful possessor, to ourselves, the legitimate Israelites. | ''Heptaplus'', Proem to 3rd exposition<ref>Hanegraaff, pg. 58</ref> }}

''On Being and the One'' ({{langx|la|De ente et uno}}) has explanations of several passages in the [[Pentateuch]], Plato and Aristotle. It is an attempted reconciliation between Platonic and Aristotelian writings on the relative places of being and "[[henology|the one]]" and a refutation of opposing arguments.

He wrote in Italian an imitation of Plato's ''[[Symposium (Plato)|Symposium]]''. His letters (''Aureae ad familiares epistolae'' Paris, 1499) are important for the history of contemporary thought. The many editions of his entire works in the sixteenth century sufficiently prove his influence.

Another notorious text by Pico is ''De omnibus rebus et de quibusdam aliis'' ("Of all things that exist and a little more"), which is mentioned in some entries on Thomas More's ''[[Utopia (More book)|Utopia]]'' and makes fun of the title of Lucretius' ''[[De rerum natura]]''.