Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Double-slit experiment
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Delayed choice and quantum eraser variations=== {{Main|Delayed-choice quantum eraser}} [[File:Wheeler telescopes set-up.svg|alt=Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment|thumb|A diagram of Wheeler's delayed choice experiment, showing the principle of determining the path of the photon after it passes through the slit]] [[Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment]]s demonstrate that extracting "which path" information after a particle passes through the slits can seem to retroactively alter its previous behavior at the slits. [[Quantum eraser]] experiments demonstrate that wave behavior can be restored by erasing or otherwise making permanently unavailable the "which path" information. A simple do-it-at-home illustration of the quantum eraser phenomenon was given in an article in ''Scientific American''.<ref name="Hillmer2007">{{cite magazine|last=Hillmer|first=R.|year=2007|title=A do-it-yourself quantum eraser|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/slideshow/a-do-it-yourself-quantum-eraser/|magazine=Scientific American|volume=296|issue=5|pages=90β95|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0507-90|author2-link=Paul Kwiat|author2=Kwiat, P.|access-date=11 January 2016|bibcode = 2007SciAm.296e..90H }}</ref> If one sets polarizers before each slit with their axes orthogonal to each other, the interference pattern will be eliminated. The polarizers can be considered as introducing which-path information to each beam. Introducing a third polarizer in front of the detector with an axis of 45Β° relative to the other polarizers "erases" this information, allowing the interference pattern to reappear. This can also be accounted for by considering the light to be a classical wave,<ref name=Hillmer2007 />{{rp|91}} and also when using circular polarizers and single photons.<ref name=Chiao1995 />{{rp|6}} Implementations of the polarizers using [[Quantum entanglement|entangled]] photon pairs have no classical explanation.<ref name=Chiao1995>{{cite journal |last=Chiao |first=R. Y. |author2=P. G. Kwiat |author3=Steinberg, A. M. |title=Quantum non-locality in two-photon experiments at Berkeley|journal=Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B |year=1995 |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=259β278 |doi=10.1088/1355-5111/7/3/006|arxiv = quant-ph/9501016 |bibcode = 1995QuSOp...7..259C |s2cid=118987962 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Double-slit experiment
(section)
Add topic