Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Bell's theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Free will theorem=== {{main|Free will theorem}} The Kochen–Specker type of argument, using configurations of interlocking bases, can be combined with the idea of measuring entangled pairs that underlies Bell-type inequalities. This was noted beginning in the 1970s by Kochen,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Redhead |first1=Michael |author-link1=Michael Redhead |last2=Brown |first2=Harvey |author-link2=Harvey R. Brown |date=1991-07-01 |title=Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics |journal=[[Aristotelian Society|Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes]] |language=en |volume=65 |issue=1 |pages=119–160 |doi=10.1093/aristoteliansupp/65.1.119 |issn=0309-7013 |jstor=4106773 |quote=A similar approach was arrived at independently by Simon Kochen, although never published (private communication).}}</ref> Heywood and Redhead,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Heywood|first1=Peter|last2=Redhead|first2=Michael L. G. |author-link2=Michael Redhead |date=May 1983|title=Nonlocality and the Kochen–Specker paradox |journal=[[Foundations of Physics]] |language=en|volume=13|issue=5|pages=481–499|doi=10.1007/BF00729511|bibcode=1983FoPh...13..481H |s2cid=120340929|issn=0015-9018}}</ref> Stairs,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Stairs|first=Allen|date=December 1983|title=Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness|journal=[[Philosophy of Science (journal)|Philosophy of Science]] |language=en|volume=50|issue=4|pages=578–602|doi=10.1086/289140|s2cid=122885859|issn=0031-8248}}</ref> and Brown and Svetlichny.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Brown |first1=H. R. |author-link1=Harvey Brown (philosopher) |last2=Svetlichny|first2=G.|date=November 1990|title=Nonlocality and Gleason's lemma. Part I. Deterministic theories|journal=[[Foundations of Physics]] |language=en|volume=20|issue=11|pages=1379–1387|doi=10.1007/BF01883492|bibcode=1990FoPh...20.1379B |s2cid=122868901 |issn=0015-9018}}</ref> As EPR pointed out, obtaining a measurement outcome on one half of an entangled pair implies certainty about the outcome of a corresponding measurement on the other half. The "EPR criterion of reality" posits that because the second half of the pair was not disturbed, that certainty must be due to a physical property belonging to it.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Glick|first1=David|last2=Boge|first2=Florian J.|date=2019-10-22|title=Is the Reality Criterion Analytic?|journal=[[Erkenntnis]]|language=en|volume=86|issue=6|pages=1445–1451|arxiv=1909.11893|bibcode=2019arXiv190911893G|doi=10.1007/s10670-019-00163-w|s2cid=202889160|issn=0165-0106}}</ref> In other words, by this criterion, a hidden variable <math>\lambda</math> must exist within the second, as-yet unmeasured half of the pair. No contradiction arises if only one measurement on the first half is considered. However, if the observer has a choice of multiple possible measurements, and the vectors defining those measurements form a Kochen–Specker configuration, then some outcome on the second half will be simultaneously impossible and guaranteed. This type of argument gained attention when an instance of it was advanced by [[John Horton Conway|John Conway]] and [[Simon B. Kochen|Simon Kochen]] under the name of the [[free will theorem]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Conway | first1 = John |first2=Simon |last2=Kochen | author-link1=John Horton Conway | author-link2=Simon B. Kochen |year = 2006 | title = The Free Will Theorem | journal = [[Foundations of Physics]] | volume = 36 | issue = 10 | pages = 1441 | doi = 10.1007/s10701-006-9068-6 |arxiv = quant-ph/0604079 |bibcode = 2006FoPh...36.1441C | s2cid = 12999337 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Rehmeyer |first=Julie |date=2008-08-15 |title=Do subatomic particles have free will? |url=https://www.sciencenews.org/article/do-subatomic-particles-have-free-will |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=[[Science News]] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Rachel |date=2011-12-27 |title=John Conway – discovering free will (part I) |url=https://plus.maths.org/content/john-conway-discovering-free-will-part-i |access-date=2022-04-23 |website=[[Plus Magazine]] |language=en}}</ref> The Conway–Kochen theorem uses a pair of entangled [[qutrit]]s and a Kochen–Specker configuration discovered by [[Asher Peres]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Conway |first1=John H. |first2=Simon |last2=Kochen | author-link1=John Horton Conway | author-link2=Simon B. Kochen |title=The strong free will theorem |journal= [[Notices of the AMS]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |year=2009 |pages=226–232 |url=http://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200226p.pdf}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Bell's theorem
(section)
Add topic