Editing Adrian Lamo (section)

===Greenwald, Lamo, and ''Wired'' magazine===
Lamo's role in Manning's case drew criticism from [[Glenn Greenwald]], who suggested that Lamo lied to Manning by turning her in and then lied after the fact to cover up the circumstances of her confessions.<ref name=gg>
{{cite news
 |last = Greenwald
 |first = Glenn
 |author-link = Glenn Greenwald
 |title = The strange and consequential case of Bradley Manning, Adrian Lamo and WikiLeaks
 |work = [[Salon.com|Salon]]
 |date = June 18, 2010
 |url = http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/18/wikileaks
 |access-date = June 18, 2010
 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100621003856/http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/18/wikileaks
 |archive-date = June 21, 2010
 |url-status = dead
 |df = mdy-all
}}
</ref> In an article about the case, Greenwald mentioned ''Wired'' reporter [[Kevin Poulsen]]'s 1994 felony conviction for computer hacking and wrote that "over the years, Poulsen has served more or less as Lamo's personal media voice."<ref name=gg /> In an article titled "The Worsening Journalistic Disgrace at Wired", Greenwald wrote that ''Wired'' was "actively conceal[ing] from the public, for months on end, the key evidence [the full Lamo–Manning chat logs] in a political story that has generated headlines around the world."<ref>{{cite news|last=Greenwald|first=Glenn|author-link=Glenn Greenwald|url=http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/27/wired|title=The worsening journalistic disgrace at Wired|work=Salon|date=December 27, 2010|access-date=August 25, 2013}}</ref>

This drew a response from ''Wired'': "At his most reasonable, Greenwald impugns our motives, attacks the character of our staff and carefully selects his facts and sources to misrepresent the truth and generate outrage in his readership."<ref name="wiredgg">{{cite magazine |last=Hansen |first=Evan |date=December 31, 2010 |title=Putting the Record Straight on the Lamo–Manning Chat Logs &#124; Threat Level |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/greenwald/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=August 25, 2013}}</ref>

On July 13, 2011, ''Wired'' published the Lamo–Manning chat logs in full, stating: "The most significant of the unpublished details have now been publicly established with sufficient authority that we no longer believe any purpose is served by withholding the logs."<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Hansen |first=Evan |date=July 13, 2011 |title=Manning–Lamo Chat Logs Revealed |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/ |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |access-date=July 14, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714160225/http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/ |archive-date=July 14, 2011}}</ref> Greenwald wrote that the logs validated his claim that ''Wired'' had concealed important evidence.<ref>{{cite news|title=Wired publishes the full Manning–Lamo chat logs|first=Glenn|last=Greenwald|author-link=Glenn Greenwald|url=http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07/14/wired/index.html|newspaper=Salon|date=July 14, 2011|access-date=July 14, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715211508/http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07/14/wired/index.html|archive-date=July 15, 2011}}</ref>