Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Anthropology
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Military involvement=== Anthropologists' involvement with the U.S. government, in particular, has caused bitter controversy within the discipline. [[Franz Boas]] publicly objected to US participation in World War I, and after the war, he published a brief exposΓ© and condemnation of the participation of several American archaeologists in espionage in Mexico under their cover as scientists.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Browman|first=David|date=22 November 2011|title=Spying by American Archaeologists in World War I|journal=Bulletin of the History of Archaeology|language=en|volume=21|issue=2|pages=10β17|doi=10.5334/bha.2123|issn=2047-6930|doi-access=free}}</ref> But by the 1940s, many of Boas' anthropologist contemporaries were active in the allied war effort against the [[Axis Powers]] (Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan). Many served in the armed forces, while others worked in intelligence (for example, the [[Office of Strategic Services]] and the [[Office of War Information]]). At the same time, [[David Price (anthropologist)|David H. Price]]'s work on American anthropology during the Cold War provides detailed accounts of the pursuit and dismissal of several anthropologists from their jobs for communist sympathies.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Price|first=David H.|date=1 June 1998|title=Cold war anthropology: Collaborators and victims of the national security state|journal=Identities|volume=4|issue=3β4|pages=389β430|doi=10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962596|issn=1070-289X}}</ref> Attempts to accuse anthropologists of complicity with the CIA and government intelligence activities during the Vietnam War years have turned up little. Many anthropologists (students and teachers) were active in the antiwar movement. Numerous resolutions condemning the war in all its aspects were passed overwhelmingly at the annual meetings of the [[American Anthropological Association]] (AAA).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=Richard Borshay |title=The anti-imperialist tradition in North American anthropology: Vietnam, the Left Academy, and the founding of ARPA |journal=Dialectical Anthropology |date=June 2016 |volume=40 |issue=2 |page=60 |doi=10.1007/s10624-016-9412-y |jstor=43895186 |s2cid=146855589 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43895186 |access-date=24 October 2022}}</ref> Professional anthropological bodies often object to the use of anthropology for the benefit of the [[State (polity)|state]]. Their codes of ethics or statements may proscribe anthropologists from giving secret briefings. The [[Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth]] (ASA) has called certain scholarship ethically dangerous. The "Principles of Professional Responsibility" issued by the American Anthropological Association and amended through November 1986 stated that "in relation with their own government and with host governments ... no secret research, no secret reports or debriefings of any kind should be agreed to or given."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1656|title=Past AAA Statements on Ethics β Participate & Advocate|website=www.americananthro.org|access-date=2 May 2019|archive-date=10 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180910222429/http://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1656|url-status=live}}</ref> The current "Principles of Professional Responsibility" does not make explicit mention of ethics surrounding state interactions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/|title=Ethics Forum Β» Full Text of the 2012 Ethics Statement|website=Ethics Forum|access-date=2 May 2019|archive-date=2 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502191053/http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/|url-status=live}}</ref> Anthropologists, along with other social scientists, were working with the US military as part of the US Army's strategy in Afghanistan.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0907/p01s08-wosc.htm US Army's strategy in Afghanistan: better anthropology] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080211195702/http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0907/p01s08-wosc.htm |date=11 February 2008 }}. CSMonitor.com (7 September 2007). Retrieved on 2 November 2016.</ref> ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'' reports that "Counterinsurgency efforts focus on better grasping and meeting local needs" [[War in Afghanistan (2001β2021)|in Afghanistan]], under the ''[[Human Terrain System]]'' (HTS) program; in addition, HTS teams are working with the [[US military in Iraq]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Human Terrain System: A CORDS for the 21st Century |url=http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume4/december_2006/12_06_2.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140121225645/http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume4/december_2006/12_06_2.html |archive-date=21 January 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In 2009, the American Anthropological Association's Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities (CEAUSSIC) released its final report concluding, in part, that: {{blockquote |text=When ethnographic investigation is determined by military missions, not subject to external review, where data collection occurs in the context of war, integrated into the goals of counterinsurgency, and in a potentially coercive environment β all characteristic factors of the HTS concept and its application β it can no longer be considered a legitimate professional exercise of anthropology. In summary, while we stress that constructive engagement between anthropology and the military is possible, CEAUSSIC suggests that the AAA emphasize the incompatibility of HTS with disciplinary ethics and practice for job seekers and that it further recognize the problem of allowing HTS to define the meaning of 'anthropology' within DoD.<ref>{{Cite report |title=Final Report on The Army's Human Terrain System Proof of Concept Program |date=2009-10-14 |url=https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-aaa/files/production/public/FileDownloads/pdfs/cmtes/commissions/CEAUSSIC/upload/CEAUSSIC_HTS_Final_Report.pdf |last=AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities |access-date=2023-05-23 |publication-date=2009-10-14 |archive-date=29 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231029201022/https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-aaa/files/production/public/FileDownloads/pdfs/cmtes/commissions/CEAUSSIC/upload/CEAUSSIC_HTS_Final_Report.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Anthropology
(section)
Add topic