Editing William of Ockham (section)

===Efficient reasoning===
One important contribution that he made to modern science and modern intellectual culture was efficient reasoning with the principle of parsimony in explanation and theory building that came to be known as [[Occam's razor]]. This maxim, as interpreted by [[Bertrand Russell]],<ref name="russell">{{cite book |last=Russell |first=Bertrand |title=[[A History of Western Philosophy]] |publisher=[[Allen & Unwin]] |year=2000 |isbn=0-415-22854-9 |pages=462–463 |author-link=Bertrand Russell}}</ref> states that if one can explain a phenomenon without assuming this or that hypothetical entity, there is no ground for assuming it, i.e. that one should always opt for an explanation in terms of the fewest possible causes, factors, or variables. He turned this into a concern for ontological parsimony; the principle says that one should not multiply entities beyond necessity—{{lang|la|Entia non sunt multiplicanda sine necessitate}}—although this well-known formulation of the principle is not to be found in any of William's extant writings.<ref name="thorburn">{{cite journal |url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Occam's_Razor |title=The Myth of Occam's Razor |journal=[[Mind (journal)|Mind]] |first=W. M. |last=Thorburn |volume=27 |issue=107 |pages=345–353 |year=1918 |doi=10.1093/mind/XXVII.3.345 |access-date=15 May 2022}}</ref> He formulates it as: "For nothing ought to be posited without a reason given, unless it is self-evident (literally, known through itself) or known by experience or proved by the authority of Sacred Scripture."<ref>Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). ''The Cambridge Companion to Ockham''. Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 104.</ref> For William of Ockham, the only truly necessary entity is God; everything else is contingent. He thus does not accept the [[principle of sufficient reason]], rejects the distinction between essence and existence, and opposes the [[Thomism|Thomistic doctrine]] of active and passive intellect. His scepticism to which his ontological parsimony request leads appears in his doctrine that human reason can prove neither the immortality of the soul; nor the existence, unity, and infinity of God. These truths, he teaches, are known to us by revelation alone.<ref name="Turner1913"/>