Editing Vibrio cholerae (section)

=== Taxonomy ===
Pacini had used the name "''vibrio cholera''", without proper [[Binomial nomenclature|binomial]] rendering, for the name of the bacterium.<ref>{{Cite web|last=|title=Taxonomy browser (Vibrio cholerae)|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=info&id=666|access-date=2021-04-05|website=www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov|archive-date=2020-09-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920060115/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Info&id=666|url-status=live}}</ref> Following Koch's description, a scientific name ''Bacillus comma'' was popularised. But an Italian bacteriologist Vittore Trevisan published in 1884 that Koch's bacterium was the same as that of Pacini's and introduced the name ''Bacillus cholerae.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Subba Rao|first1=M.|last2=Howard-Jones|first2=N.|date=1978|title=Original observations of Filippo Pacini on vibrio cholera|url=http://ccras.nic.in/sites/default/files/viewpdf/jimh/BIIHM_1978/32%20to%2038.pdf|journal=Bulletin of the Indian Institute of History of Medicine (Hyderabad)|volume=8|issue=1–4|pages=32–38|pmid=11613633|access-date=2021-04-05|archive-date=2022-07-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220707032600/http://www.ccras.nic.in/sites/default/files/viewpdf/jimh/BIIHM_1978/32%20to%2038.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>'' A German physician [[Richard Friedrich Johannes Pfeiffer]] renamed it as ''Vibrio cholerae'' in 1896.<ref name=":4" /> The named was adopted by the [[Society of American Bacteriologists|Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types]] in 1920.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Winslow|first1=C. E.|last2=Broadhurst|first2=J.|last3=Buchanan|first3=R. E.|last4=Krumwiede|first4=C.|last5=Rogers|first5=L. A.|last6=Smith|first6=G. H.|date=1920|title=The Families and Genera of the Bacteria: Final Report of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types|journal=Journal of Bacteriology|volume=5|issue=3|pages=191–229|doi=10.1128/JB.5.3.191-229.1920|pmc=378870|pmid=16558872}}</ref> In 1964, Rudolph Hugh of the George Washington University School of Medicine proposed to use the genus ''Vibrio'' with the type species ''V. cholerae'' (Pacini 1854) as a permanent name of the bacterium, regardless of the same name for protozoa.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hugh|first=R.|date=1964|title=The Proposed Conservation of the Generic Name Vibrio Pacini 1854 and Designation of the Neotype Strain of Vibrio Cholerae Pacini 1854|journal=International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy|language=en|volume=14|issue=2|pages=87–101|doi=10.1099/0096266X-14-2-87|doi-access=free}}</ref> It was accepted by the [[International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes|Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature]] in 1965,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature|date=1965|title=Opinion 31. Conservation of Vibrio Pacini 1854 as a Bacterial Generic Name, Conservation of Vibrio Cholerae Pacini 1854 as the Nomenclatural Type Species of the Bacterial Genus Vibrio, and Designation of Neotype Strain of Vibrio Cholerae Pacini|journal=International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy|language=en|volume=15|issue=3|pages=185–186|doi=10.1099/00207713-15-3-185|doi-access=free}}</ref> and the [[International Association of Microbiological Societies]] in 1966.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Feeley|first=J. C.|date=1966|title=Minutes of IAMS Subcommittee on Taxonomy of Vibrios|journal=International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology|language=en|volume=16|issue=2|pages=135–142|doi=10.1099/00207713-16-2-135|doi-access=free}}</ref>