Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
The Old Man and the Sea
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Quality and accuracy=== Some literary critics find ''The Old Man and the Sea'' inferior to Hemingway's earlier works. [[Dwight Macdonald]] criticises the pseudo-archaic prose which pretends it is [[high culture]], but in reality is anything but.{{sfn|Macdonald|1960|pp=593, 596}} He compares the novella unfavourably with Hemingway's earlier works; he deplored ''The Old Man and the Sea'' as garrulous and repetitive when compared to the "disciplined, businesslike understatement" of [[The Undefeated (short story)|''The Undefeated'']], a short story Hemingway wrote in 1927.{{sfn|Macdonald|1960|pp=597–598}} Similarly, Brenner characterises the novella as riddled with amateurish mistakes in style and prose.{{sfn|Brenner|1991|pp=68–78}} Meyers criticises ''The Old Man and the Sea''{{'}}s melodrama, symbolism, and irony, concluding, like Macdonald, that "Hemingway either deceived himself about the profundity of his art" or expertly satisfied the desires of a pretentious audience.{{sfn|Meyers|1985|p=489}} Robert Weeks notes that the novella abounds in factual impossibilities—he cites Santiago's near-[[clairvoyance]] in identifying fishes and judging weather patterns. Weeks maintains that Hemingway—previously criticized for his distaste for narrative invention—had instilled insincerity at the heart of his novel. He concluded that ''The Old Man and the Sea'' is "an inferior Hemingway novel."{{sfn|Weeks|1962|pp=188–192}} Bickford Sylvester comments that most of the errors Weeks outlined were based upon faults in then-current science, and some others were intended to nudge readers towards the work's subtext and deepest details.{{sfn|Sylvester|1996|pp=265–266}} Sylvester argues that seemingly-implausible narrative details in ''The Old Man and the Sea'' are actually hints. He cites the baseball conversation between Santiago and Manolin, which subtly indicates not only the precise dates of the novella's events (September 12–16, 1950) but also parallels the fisherman with his hero DiMaggio, also the son of a fisherman, who similarly resurged in performance during that week.{{sfn|Sylvester|1996|pp=246–249, 256–261}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
The Old Man and the Sea
(section)
Add topic