Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Splitting lemma
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Non-abelian groups== In the form stated here, the splitting lemma does not hold in the full [[category of groups]], which is not an abelian category. ===Partially true=== It is partially true: if a short exact sequence of groups is left split or a direct sum (1. or 3.), then all of the conditions hold. For a direct sum this is clear, as one can inject from or project to the summands. For a left split sequence, the map {{math|''t'' Γ ''r'': ''B'' β ''A'' Γ ''C''}} gives an isomorphism, so {{math|''B''}} is a direct sum (3.), and thus inverting the isomorphism and composing with the natural injection {{math|''C'' β ''A'' Γ ''C''}} gives an injection {{math|''C'' β ''B''}} splitting {{math|''r''}} (2.). However, if a short exact sequence of groups is right split (2.), then it need not be left split or a direct sum (neither 1. nor 3. follows): the problem is that the image of the right splitting need not be [[normal subgroup|normal]]. What is true in this case is that {{math|''B''}} is a [[semidirect product]], though not in general a [[direct product of groups|direct product]]. ===Counterexample=== To form a counterexample, take the smallest [[non-abelian group]] {{math|''B'' β ''S''{{sub|3}}}}, the [[symmetric group]] on three letters. Let {{math|''A''}} denote the [[alternating group|alternating subgroup]], and let {{math|''C'' {{=}} ''B''/''A'' β {Β±1}}}. Let {{math|''q''}} and {{math|''r''}} denote the inclusion map and the [[parity of a permutation|sign]] map respectively, so that : <math>0 \longrightarrow A \mathrel{\stackrel{q}{\longrightarrow}} B \mathrel{\stackrel{r}{\longrightarrow}} C \longrightarrow 0 </math> is a short exact sequence. 3. fails, because {{math|''S''{{sub|3}}}} is not abelian, but 2. holds: we may define {{math|''u'': ''C'' β ''B''}} by mapping the generator to any [[cyclic permutation|two-cycle]]. Note for completeness that 1. fails: any map {{math|''t'': ''B'' β ''A''}} must map every two-cycle to the [[identity permutation|identity]] because the map has to be a [[group homomorphism]], while the [[order (group theory)|order]] of a two-cycle is 2 which can not be divided by the order of the elements in ''A'' other than the identity element, which is 3 as {{math|''A''}} is the alternating subgroup of {{math|''S''{{sub|3}}}}, or namely the [[cyclic group]] of [[order of a group|order]] 3. But every [[permutation]] is a product of two-cycles, so {{math|''t''}} is the trivial map, whence {{math|''tq'': ''A'' β ''A''}} is the trivial map, not the identity.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Splitting lemma
(section)
Add topic