Editing Ptolemy (section)

====Modern reassessment====
Under the scrutiny of modern scholarship, and the cross-checking of observations contained in the ''Almagest'' against figures produced through backwards extrapolation, various patterns of errors have emerged within the work.{{sfn|Wade|1977}}{{sfn|Lewis|1979}} A prominent miscalculation is Ptolemy's use of measurements that he claimed were taken at noon, but which systematically produce readings now shown to be off by half an hour, as if the observations were taken at 12:30&nbsp;pm.{{sfn|Wade|1977}}

The overall quality of Ptolemy's observations has been challenged by several modern scientists, but prominently by [[Robert R. Newton]] in his 1977 book ''The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy'', which asserted that Ptolemy fabricated many of his observations to fit his theories.{{sfn|Goldstein|1978}} Newton accused Ptolemy of systematically inventing data or doctoring the data of earlier astronomers, and labelled him "the most successful fraud in the history of science".{{sfn|Wade|1977}} One striking error noted by Newton was an autumn equinox said to have been observed by Ptolemy and "measured with the greatest care" at 2pm on 25 September 132, when the equinox should have been observed around 9:55am the day prior.{{sfn|Wade|1977}} In attempting to disprove Newton, Herbert Lewis also found himself agreeing that "Ptolemy was an outrageous fraud,"{{sfn|Lewis|1979}} and that "all those result capable of statistical analysis point beyond question towards fraud and against accidental error".{{sfn|Lewis|1979}}

The charges laid by Newton and others have been the subject of wide discussions and received significant push back from other scholars against the findings.{{sfn|Wade|1977}} [[Owen Gingerich]], while agreeing that the ''Almagest'' contains "some remarkably fishy numbers",{{sfn|Wade|1977}} including in the matter of the 30-hour displaced equinox, which he noted aligned perfectly with predictions made by Hipparchus 278 years earlier,{{sfn|Gingerich|1980}} rejected the qualification of fraud.{{sfn|Wade|1977}} Objections were also raised by [[Bernard R. Goldstein|Bernard Goldstein]], who questioned Newton's findings and suggested that he had misunderstood the secondary literature, while noting that issues with the accuracy of Ptolemy's observations had long been known.{{sfn|Goldstein|1978}} Other authors have pointed out that instrument warping or atmospheric refraction may also explain some of Ptolemy's observations at a wrong time.<ref>
{{cite journal
 |last1=Bruin |first1=Franz
 |last2=Bruin |first2=Margaret
 |title=The equator ring, equinoxes, and atmospheric refraction
 |journal=Centaurus
 |year=1976
 |volume=20 |issue=2 |page=89
 |doi=10.1111/j.1600-0498.1976.tb00923.x
 |bibcode=1976Cent...20...89B
}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite thesis
 |last1=Britton |first1=John Phillips
 |title=On the quality of solar and lunar observations and parameters in Ptolemy's ''Almagest''
 |year=1967
 |publisher=Yale University
 |degree=Ph.D.
}}
</ref>

In 2022 the first Greek fragments of Hipparchus' lost star catalog were discovered in a [[palimpsest]] and they debunked accusations made by the French astronomer [[Jean Baptiste Joseph Delambre]] in the early 1800s which were repeated by R. R. Newton. Specifically, it proved Hipparchus was not the sole source of Ptolemy's catalog, as they both had claimed, and proved that Ptolemy did not simply copy Hipparchus' measurements and adjust them to account for precession of the equinoxes, as they had claimed. Scientists analyzing the charts concluded:

<blockquote>It also confirms that Ptolemy’s Star Catalogue was not based solely on data from Hipparchus’ Catalogue.<br/>

... These observations are consistent with the view that Ptolemy composed his star catalogue by combining various sources, including Hipparchus’ catalogue, his own observations and, possibly, those of other authors.<ref>
{{cite journal
 |last1=Gysembergh |first1=Victor
 |last2=Williams   |first2=Peter J.
 |last3=Zingg      |first3=Emanuel
 |date=November 2022
 |title=New evidence for Hipparchus' star catalogue revealed by multispectral imaging
 |journal=[[Journal for the History of Astronomy]]
 |volume=53  |issue=4  |pages=383–393
 |doi=10.1177/00218286221128289
 |bibcode=2022JHA....53..383G |issn=0021-8286
 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00218286221128289
}}
</ref>
</blockquote>