Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mass deacidification
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Adoption and costs == While deacidification has been adopted by major research libraries such as the Library of Congress and the New York Public Library, it is not clear whether many archives, particularly those in the United States, have followed suit. Some European national archives have tested deacidification techniques. The United States' [[National Archives and Records Administration]] (NARA), which pioneered an aqueous technique that improved upon Barrow's, chose to invest its preservation dollars elsewhere.<ref name="Ritzenthaler1" /> In 2000, the Chief of the NARA Document Conservation Laboratory defended the lack of a mass deacidification program by pointing to differences between library and archival collections. For example, noting that many of the papers coming to NARA were of a higher quality than those in library collections; that the Archives does not receive records from federal government agencies until they are at least 30 years old, by which time acidic paper will have already been irrevocably weakened, and that limited resources might best be applied elsewhere, such as climate control. Under the Archives' Twenty-Year Preservation Plan, emphasis was placed on achieving the "maximum benefit for the greatest number of records."<ref>Jones, N. (2000). [https://www.archives.gov/preservation/conservation/mass-deacidification.html Mass Deacidification: Considerations for Archives] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170720015213/https://www.archives.gov/preservation/conservation/mass-deacidification.html |date=2017-07-20 }} ''National Archives and Records Administration 15th Annual Preservation Conference.'' Washington, D.C., March 2000, URL accessed April 28, 2008.</ref> Though now dated, several sources estimate the costs and suitability of deacidification treatment. Studies conducted by the [[Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center]] and the General State Archive of the Netherlands found the DEZ method might be particularly applicable to archival materials.<ref>Harris, K. & Shahani, C. (1994). [https://www.loc.gov/preserv/deacid/dezeval.html Mass Deacidification: An Initiative to Refine the Diethyl Zinc Process] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090911094109/http://www.loc.gov/preserv/deacid/dezeval.html |date=2009-09-11 }}</ref> It was estimated that deacidification costs, excluding transportation and handling, during the early 1990s was $5β10 per volume.<ref>Sparks, Peter G. (1990). [http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/sparks/sparks.html Technical Considerations in Choosing Mass Deacidification Processes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071205030139/http://clir.org/pubs/reports/sparks/sparks.html |date=2007-12-05 }}. URL accessed April 28, 2008.</ref> During 1995β1997, the Library of Congress received $2 million in appropriations to deacidify 72,000 books using the Bookkeeper commercial method and evaluate alternative methods. The actual cost per book was $11.70.<ref>Dalrymple, W. (1997). [https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/970421/deacid.html A Paper Chase: Technology Helps Library Save its Paper Collections] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170118134111/http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/970421/deacid.html |date=2017-01-18 }}. ''LC Information Bulletin''. URL accessed April 28, 2008.</ref> Finally, a 2003 cost comparison with reformatting options per volume yielded $125 for microfilming, $50 for scanning and minimal indexing and, based on a New York Public Library project, $16.20 for deacidification.<ref name="ifla1" /> However, already in 2004 [[Google Books]] was able to scan for only $10-$20 per book.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Digitizing Initiatives: Methods and Costs |url=https://tfaoi.org/aa/5aa/5aa60.htm |access-date=2024-11-03 |website=tfaoi.org}}</ref> As of 2022, there were five mass deacidification plants in the world.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.qnl.qa/en/about/news/qatar-national-library-inaugurates-its-first-mass-deacidification-plant-middle-east | title=Qatar National Library Inaugurates its First Mass Deacidification Plant in the Middle East | Qatar National Library | access-date=2023-01-28 | archive-date=2023-01-25 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125175634/https://www.qnl.qa/en/about/news/qatar-national-library-inaugurates-its-first-mass-deacidification-plant-middle-east | url-status=live }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mass deacidification
(section)
Add topic