Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Marcan priority
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Marcan style=== Mark's style of Greek is unique among the Gospels. Some scholars have argued that Mark's style is unsophisticated and unrefined or awkward. But others find Mark's Greek very dense and detailed. Mark is full of Latinisms, in idioms and vocabulary. Mark tends to conjoin verbs and sentences with {{lang|grc|καὶ}} ({{transliteration|grc|kai}}, "and"); in fact, more than half the verses in Mark begin with {{lang|grc|καὶ}}. Mark is also notably fond of {{lang|grc|εὐθὺς}} ({{transliteration|grc|euthùs}}, "immediately") and {{lang|grc|πάλιν}} ({{transliteration|grc|pálin}}, "again"), frequently uses dual expressions, and often prefers the [[historical present]].<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zmP5-Jp8VzsC&pg=PA23 | title=Mark: A Commentary | year=2006 | pages=23–24 | isbn=0664221076 | last=Boring | first=M. Eugene | series=New Testament Library: Commentary Series }}</ref> In essence, then, Mark's style is not so much literary as thoroughly colloquial.{{sfnp|Powers|2010|pp=90–93}}{{sfnp|Goodacre|2001|p=62}} The parallel passages in Matthew and especially in Luke tend to be in a more polished and eloquent style of literary Greek. Where Mark uses an unusual word or expression, Matthew and Luke often substitute something more natural. Though they often add material of substance, they tend to trim down Mark's redundancies and verbosity and express his meaning more concisely. Supporters of Marcan priority see this as Matthew and Luke improving the style of the material they incorporate from Mark. Supporters of Marcan posteriority, however, see Mark as recasting material from Matthew and Luke in his own peculiar style, less like lofty literature and more in a vivid, fast-moving style befitting oral preaching.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Marcan priority
(section)
Add topic