Editing Lawrence of Arabia (film) (section)

=== Representation of other characters ===
The film portrays Allenby as cynical and manipulative with a superior attitude to Lawrence, but there is much evidence that Allenby and Lawrence liked and respected each other. Lawrence once said that Allenby was "an admiration of mine" and later that he was "physically large and confident and morally so great that the comprehension of our littleness came slow to him".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.castlehillpress.com/plates/pl01.htm |title=''The Seven Pillars'' Portraits |publisher=Castle Hill Press |access-date=21 January 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060313204945/http://www.castlehillpress.com/plates/pl01.htm |archive-date=13 March 2006 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/allenby.html |title=General Allenby (biography) |publisher=pbs.org |access-date=2 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171125103413/http://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/allenby.html |archive-date=25 November 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> The fictional Allenby's words at Lawrence's funeral in the film stand in contrast to the real Allenby's remarks upon Lawrence's death,

{{blockquote|I have lost a good friend and a valued comrade. Lawrence was under my command, but, after acquainting him with my strategical plan, I gave him a free hand. His co-operation was marked by the utmost loyalty, and I never had anything but praise for his work, which, indeed, was invaluable throughout the campaign."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/allenby2.html |title=General Allenby (radio interview) |publisher=pbs.org |access-date=2 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170314231750/http://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/allenby2.html |archive-date=14 March 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref>}}

Allenby spoke highly of him numerous times and much to Lawrence's delight publicly endorsed the accuracy of ''Seven Pillars of Wisdom''. Although Allenby manipulated Lawrence during the war, their relationship lasted for years afterwards, indicating that in real life they were friendly, if not close. The Allenby family was particularly upset by the Damascus scenes, in which Allenby coldly allows the town to fall into chaos as the Arab Council collapses.<ref>Steven C. Caton, ''Lawrence of Arabia: A Film's Anthropology'', p. 59</ref>

Murray was initially sceptical of the Arab Revolt's potential but thought highly of Lawrence's abilities as an intelligence officer. It was largely through Lawrence's persuasion that Murray came to support the revolt. The intense dislike shown toward Lawrence in the film is the opposite of Murray's real feelings, but Lawrence seemed not to hold Murray in any high regard.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}}

The depiction of Auda Abu Tayi as a man interested only in loot and money is at odds with the historical record. Although Auda at first joined the revolt for monetary reasons, he became a steadfast supporter of Arab independence, notably after Aqaba's capture. Despite repeated bribery attempts by the Turks, he took their money but remained loyal to the revolt and went so far as to knock out his false teeth, which were Turkish-made. He was present with Lawrence from the beginning of the Aqaba expedition and helped to plan it, along with Lawrence and Prince Faisal. Faisal was not the middle-aged man depicted, as he was in his early thirties. Faisal and Lawrence respected each other's capabilities and intelligence and worked well together.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/feisal.html |title=Prince Feisal |publisher=pbs.org |access-date=2 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919145955/http://www.pbs.org/lawrenceofarabia/players/feisal.html |archive-date=19 September 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref>

The reactions of those who knew Lawrence and the other characters cast doubt on the film's veracity. The most vehement critic of its accuracy was Professor [[A. W. Lawrence]], T. E. Lawrence's younger brother and literary executor, who had sold the rights to ''Seven Pillars of Wisdom'' to Spiegel for £25,000 and went on a campaign in the United States and Britain to denounce the film. He said, "I should not have recognised my own brother". In one pointed talk show appearance, he remarked that he had found the film "pretentious and false" and  that his brother was "one of the nicest, kindest and most exhilarating people I've known. He often appeared cheerful when he was unhappy". Later, he said to ''[[The New York Times]]'', "[The film is] a psychological recipe. Take an ounce of narcissism, a pound of exhibitionism, a pint of sadism, a gallon of blood-lust and a sprinkle of other aberrations and stir well." Lowell Thomas was critical of the portrayal of Lawrence and of most of the film's characters and believed that the train attack scenes were the only reasonably accurate aspect of the film. Criticisms were not restricted to Lawrence. Allenby's family lodged a formal complaint against Columbia about his portrayal. Descendants of Auda Abu Tayi and Sharif Nassir (upon whom the film's Ali was partially based) went further by suing Columbia. The Auda case went on for almost 10 years before it was dropped.<ref>Adrian Turner, ''Robert Bolt: Scenes From Two Lives'', 201–06</ref>

The film has its defenders. Biographer [[Michael Korda]], the author of ''Hero: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia'', offers a different opinion. The film is neither "the full story of Lawrence's life or a completely accurate account of the two years he spent fighting with the Arabs". Korda said that criticising its inaccuracy "misses the point". "The object was to produce, not a faithful docudrama that would educate the audience, but a hit picture".<ref>Korda, pp. 693–94</ref> Stephen E. Tabachnick goes further than Korda by arguing that the film's portrayal of Lawrence is "appropriate and true to the text of ''Seven Pillars of Wisdom''".<ref>''Lawrence of Arabia: An Encyclopedia.'' Westport, CT: Greenwood, Press, 2004. p. 24</ref> David Murphy, historian and author of the 2008 book ''The Arab Revolt'', wrote that although the film was flawed with inaccuracies and omissions, "it was a truly epic movie and is rightly seen as a classic".{{sfn|Murphy|2008|pp=88–89}}