Editing Isoelectric point (section)

== Versus point of zero charge ==
The terms isoelectric point (IEP) and [[point of zero charge]] (PZC) are often used interchangeably, although under certain circumstances, it may be productive to make the distinction.

In systems in which H<sup>+</sup>/OH<sup>&minus;</sup> are the interface potential-determining ions, the point of zero charge is given in terms of pH. The pH at which the surface exhibits a neutral net electrical charge is the point of zero charge at the surface. [[Electrokinetic phenomena]] generally measure [[zeta potential]], and a zero zeta potential is interpreted as the point of zero net charge at the [[Electrical double layer|shear plane]]. This is termed the isoelectric point.<ref>A.W. Adamson, A.P. Gast, "Physical Chemistry of Surfaces", John Wiley and Sons, 1997.</ref> Thus, the isoelectric point is the value of pH at which the colloidal particle remains stationary in an electrical field. The isoelectric point is expected to be somewhat different from the point of zero charge at the particle surface, but this difference is often ignored in practice for so-called pristine surfaces, i.e., surfaces with no [[adsorption|specifically adsorbed]] positive or negative charges.<ref name="ref2pineapple" /> In this context, specific adsorption is understood as adsorption occurring in a [[Double layer (interfacial)|Stern layer]] or [[chemisorption]]. Thus, point of zero charge at the surface is taken as equal to isoelectric point in the absence of specific adsorption on that surface.

According to Jolivet,<ref name="Jolivet">Jolivet J.P., ''Metal Oxide Chemistry and Synthesis. From Solution to Solid State'', John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2000, {{ISBN|0-471-97056-5}}  (English translation of the original French text, ''De la Solution à l'Oxyde'', InterEditions et CNRS Editions, Paris, 1994).</ref> in the absence of positive or negative charges, the surface is best described by the point of zero charge. If positive and negative charges are both present in equal amounts, then this is the isoelectric point. Thus, the PZC refers to the absence of any type of surface charge, while the IEP refers to a state of neutral net surface charge. The difference between the two, therefore, is the quantity of charged sites at the point of net zero charge. Jolivet uses the intrinsic surface equilibrium constants, p''K''<sup>&minus;</sup> and p''K''<sup>+</sup> to define the two conditions in terms of the relative number of charged sites:

:<math> \mathrm{p}K^- - \mathrm{p}K^+ = \Delta \mathrm{p}K = \log {\frac{\left[\mathrm{MOH}\right]^2}{\left[\mathrm{MOH}{_2^+}\right]\left[\mathrm{MO}^-\right]}} </math>

For large Δp''K'' (>4 according to Jolivet), the predominant species is MOH while there are relatively few charged species – so the PZC is relevant.  For small values of Δp''K'', there are many charged species in approximately equal numbers, so one speaks of the IEP.