Editing Griswold v. Connecticut (section)

===Dissents===
Justices [[Hugo Black]] and [[Potter Stewart]] dissented from the Court's decision. Both justices' dissents argued that because the U.S. Constitution does not expressly mention privacy in any of its provisions, the Court had no basis to strike down Connecticut's Comstock Law.{{sfnp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=§&nbsp;10.3.2, p. 883}} Black's dissent concluded: "I get nowhere in this case by talk about a constitutional 'right of privacy' as an emanation from one or more constitutional provisions. I like my privacy as well as the next one, but I am nevertheless compelled to admit that government has a right to invade it unless prohibited by some specific constitutional provision."<ref>''Griswold'', 381 U.S. at 508 (Black, J., dissenting), quoted in {{harvp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=§&nbsp;10.3.2, p. 883}}.</ref>