Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Great man theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== William James' defence === [[File:William James b1842c.jpg|thumb|upright|[[William James]] was a 19th-century philosopher and psychologist.|left]] [[William James]], in his 1880 lecture "Great Men, Great Thoughts, and the Environment",<ref>James, William (1880), [https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/jgreatmen.html/ "Great Men, Great Thoughts, and the Environment"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328055722/http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/jgreatmen.html |date=2019-03-28 }}</ref> published in the ''[[Atlantic Monthly]]'', forcefully defended Carlyle and refuted Spencer, condemning what James viewed as an "impudent", "vague", and "dogmatic" argument.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Thoughts and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref> James' defence of the great man theory can be summarized as follows: The unique [[physiological]] nature of the individual is the deciding factor in making the great man, who, in turn, is the deciding factor in changing his environment in a unique way, without which the new environment would not have come to be, wherein the extent and nature of this change is also dependent on the reception of the environment to this new stimulus. To begin his argument, he first [[sardonically]] claims that these inherent physiological qualities have as much to do with "social, political, geographical [and] [[anthropological]] conditions" as the "conditions of the crater of [[Vesuvius]] has to do with the flickering of this gas by which I write".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Theory and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref> James argues that [[genetic anomalies]] in the brains of these ''great men'' are the decisive factor by introducing an original influence into their environment. They might therefore offer original ideas, discoveries, inventions and perspectives which "would not, in the mind of another individual, have engendered just that conclusion ... It flashes out of one brain, and no other, because the instability of that brain is such as to tip and upset itself in just that particular direction."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Thoughts and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref> James then argues that these spontaneous variations of genius, i.e. the ''great men'', which are causally independent of their social environment, subsequently influence that environment which in turn will either preserve or destroy the newly encountered variations in a form of evolutionary selection. If the great man is preserved then the environment is changed by his influence in "an entirely original and peculiar way. He acts as a ferment, and changes its constitution, just as the advent of a new zoological species changes the faunal and floral equilibrium of the region in which it appears." Each ferment, each great man, exerts a new influence on their environment which is either embraced or rejected and if embraced will in turn shape the crucible for the selection process of future geniuses.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Thoughts and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref> In the words of William James, "If we were to remove these geniuses or alter their idiosyncrasies, what increasing uniformities would the environment exhibit?" James challenges Mr. Spencer or anyone else to provide a reply. According to James, there are two distinct factors driving social evolution: personal agents and the impact of their unique qualities on the overall course of events.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Thoughts and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref> He thus concludes: "Both factors are essential to change. The community stagnates without the impulse of the individual. The impulse dies away without the sympathy of the community."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Great Men, Great Thoughts and the Environment |url=https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/James/James_1880.html}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Great man theory
(section)
Add topic