Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Fermat primality test
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Flaw== There are infinitely many [[Fermat pseudoprime]]s to any given basis ''a'' > 1.{{r|PSW|p=Theorem 1}} Even worse, there are infinitely many [[Carmichael number]]s.<ref name="Alford1994">{{cite journal |last1=Alford |first1=W. R. |author-link=W. R. (Red) Alford |last2=Granville |first2=Andrew |author-link2=Andrew Granville |last3=Pomerance |first3=Carl |author-link3=Carl Pomerance |year=1994 |title=There are Infinitely Many Carmichael Numbers |journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] |doi=10.2307/2118576 |volume=140 |issue=3 |pages=703–722 |url=http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/PDF/paper95.pdf |jstor=2118576 }}</ref> These are numbers <math>n</math> for which <em>all</em> values of <math>a</math> with <math>\operatorname{gcd}(a, n) = 1</math> are Fermat liars. For these numbers, repeated application of the Fermat primality test performs the same as a simple random search for factors. While Carmichael numbers are substantially rarer than prime numbers (Erdös' upper bound for the number of Carmichael numbers<ref> {{cite journal |author = Paul Erdős |date=1956 |title=On pseudoprimes and Carmichael numbers |journal=Publ. Math. Debrecen |volume=4 |pages=201–206|author-link=Paul Erdős|mr=0079031 }}</ref> is lower than the [[Prime number theorem|prime number function n/log(n)]]) there are enough of them that Fermat's primality test is not often used in the above form. Instead, other more powerful extensions of the Fermat test, such as [[Baillie–PSW primality test|Baillie–PSW]], [[Miller–Rabin primality test|Miller–Rabin]], and [[Solovay–Strassen primality test|Solovay–Strassen]] are more commonly used. In general, if <math>n</math> is a composite number that is not a Carmichael number, then at least half of all :<math>a\in(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^*</math> (i.e. <math>\operatorname{gcd}(a,n)=1</math>) are Fermat witnesses. For proof of this, let <math>a</math> be a Fermat witness and <math>a_1</math>, <math>a_2</math>, ..., <math>a_s</math> be Fermat liars. Then :<math>(a\cdot a_i)^{n-1} \equiv a^{n-1}\cdot a_i^{n-1} \equiv a^{n-1} \not\equiv 1\pmod{n}</math> and so all <math>a \cdot a_i</math> for <math>i = 1, 2, ..., s</math> are Fermat witnesses.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Fermat primality test
(section)
Add topic