Editing Ethics (section)

==== Utilitarianism ====
{{main|Utilitarianism}}
The most well-known form of consequentialism is utilitarianism. In its classical form, it is an act consequentialism that sees [[happiness]] as the only source of intrinsic value. This means that an act is morally right if it produces "the greatest good for the greatest number" by increasing happiness and reducing suffering. Utilitarians do not deny that other things also have value, like health, friendship, and knowledge. However, they deny that these things have intrinsic value. Instead, they say that they have extrinsic value because they affect happiness and suffering. In this regard, they are desirable as a means but, unlike happiness, not as an end.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Slote|2005|pp=936, 938}} | {{harvnb|Sinnott-Armstrong|2023|loc=§ 1. Classic Utilitarianism}} }}</ref> The view that pleasure is the only thing with intrinsic value is called ethical or [[evaluative hedonism]].<ref>{{harvnb|Moore|2019|loc=Lead section, § 2. Ethical Hedonism}}</ref>

{{multiple image
|total_width=400px
|perrow=2/1
|image1=Jeremy_Bentham_by_Henry_William_Pickersgill_detail.jpg
|alt1=Painting of Jeremy Bentham
|image2=John_Stuart_Mill_by_London_Stereoscopic_Company,_c1870.jpg
|alt2=Photo of John Stuart Mill
|footer=[[Jeremy Bentham]] and [[John Stuart Mill]] are the founding fathers of classical utilitarianism.<ref>{{harvnb|Suikkanen|2020|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=343mDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA24 24]}}</ref>
}}

Classical utilitarianism was initially formulated by [[Jeremy Bentham]] at the end of the 18th century and further developed by [[John Stuart Mill]]. Bentham introduced the [[hedonic calculus]] to assess the value of consequences. Two key aspects of the hedonic calculus are the intensity and the duration of pleasure. According to this view, a pleasurable experience has a high value if it has a high intensity and lasts for a long time. A common criticism of Bentham's utilitarianism argued that its focus on the intensity of pleasure promotes an immoral lifestyle centered around indulgence in sensory gratification. Mill responded to this criticism by distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures. He stated that higher pleasures, like the intellectual satisfaction of reading a book, are more valuable than lower pleasures, like the sensory enjoyment of food and drink, even if their intensity and duration are the same.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Slote|2005|pp=936, 938}} | {{harvnb|Mendus|2005|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=wYWGIpa7Qr4C&pg=PA141 141]}} | {{harvnb|Kivy|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-c7ThZc5Rv0C&pg=PA238 238]}} }}</ref> Since its original formulation, many variations of utilitarianism have developed, including the difference between [[Act utilitarianism|act]] and [[rule utilitarianism]] and between maximizing and satisficing utilitarianism.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Slote|2005|p=938}} | {{harvnb|Hooker|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=z3zBAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA281 281]}} | {{harvnb|Satyanarayana|2009|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=gjiBTNR1g0kC&pg=PT76 76]}} }}</ref>