Editing Drug policy of the Netherlands (section)

==Implications of international law==
The Netherlands is a party to the 1961 [[Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs]], the 1971 [[Convention on Psychotropic Substances]], and the 1988 [[United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances]]. The 1961 convention prohibits cultivation and trade of naturally occurring drugs such as cannabis; the 1971 treaty bans the manufacture and trafficking of synthetic drugs such as [[barbiturates]] and [[amphetamines]]; and the 1988 convention requires states to criminalize illicit drug possession:
<blockquote>Subject to its constitutional principles and the basic concepts of its legal system, each Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish as a criminal offence under its domestic law, when committed intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention, the 1961 Convention as amended or the 1971 Convention.</blockquote>
The [[International Narcotics Control Board]] typically interprets this provision to mean that states must prosecute drug possession offenses. The conventions clearly state that controlled substances are to be restricted to scientific and medical uses. However, [[Cindy Fazey]], former Chief of Demand Reduction for the [[United Nations Drug Control Programme]], believes that the treaties have enough ambiguities and loopholes to allow some room to maneuver. In her report entitled ''The Mechanics and Dynamics of the UN System for International Drug Control'', she notes:
<blockquote>Many countries have now decided not to use the full weight of criminal sanctions against people who are in possession of drugs that are for their personal consumption. The Conventions say that there must be an offence under domestic criminal law, it does not say that the law has to be enforced, or that when it is what sanctions should apply. . . . Despite such grey areas latitude is by no means unlimited. The centrality of the principle of limiting narcotic and psychotropic drugs for medical and scientific purposes leaves no room for the legal possibility of recreational use. . . . Nations may currently be pushing the boundaries of the international system, but the pursuit of any action to formally legalize non-medical and non-scientific drug use would require either treaty revision or a complete or partial withdrawal from the current regime.</blockquote>
The Dutch policy of keeping anti-drug laws on the books while limiting enforcement of certain offenses is carefully designed to reduce harm while still complying with the letter of international drug control treaties. This is necessary in order to avoid criticism from the International Narcotics Board, which historically has taken a dim view of any moves to relax official drug policy. In their annual report, the Board has criticised many governments, including Canada, for permitting the medicinal use of cannabis, Australia for providing injecting rooms and the United Kingdom for proposing to downgrade the classification of cannabis,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fuoriluogo.it/arretrati/2003/apr_17_en.htm |title=aprile 2003 |publisher=fuoriluogo.it |access-date=2011-04-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150423160616/http://www.fuoriluogo.it/arretrati/2003/apr_17_en.htm |archive-date=2015-04-23 |url-status=dead }}</ref> which it has since done (although this change was reversed by the Home Secretary on 7 May 2008 against the advice of its own commissioned report).