Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Don't ask, don't tell
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===''Witt v. Department of the Air Force''=== In April 2006, Margaret Witt, a major in the [[United States Air Force]] who was being investigated for homosexuality, filed suit in the [[United States District Court for the Western District of Washington]] seeking [[Declaratory relief|declaratory]] and [[Injunction|injunctive relief]] on the grounds that DADT violates substantive [[due process]], the Equal Protection Clause, and procedural due process. In July 2007 the [[United States Secretary of the Air Force|Secretary of the Air Force]] ordered her honorable discharge. Dismissed by the district court, the case was heard on appeal, and the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling on May 21, 2008. Its decision in ''[[Witt v. Department of the Air Force]]'' reinstated Witt's substantive-due-process and procedural-due-process claims and affirmed the dismissal of her Equal Protection claim. The Ninth Circuit, analyzing the Supreme Court decision in ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' (2003), determined that DADT had to be subjected to heightened scrutiny, meaning that there must be an "important" governmental interest at issue, that DADT must "significantly" further the governmental interest, and that there can be no less intrusive way for the government to advance that interest. The [[Presidency of Barack Obama|Obama administration]] declined to appeal, allowing a May 3, 2009, deadline to pass, leaving ''Witt'' as binding on the entire Ninth Circuit, and returning the case to the District Court.<ref>{{cite news |last= Bravin |first= Jess |author2= Laura Meckler |title= Obama Avoids Test on Gays in Military |work= [[The Wall Street Journal]] |date= May 19, 2009 |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124268952606832391 |access-date= July 24, 2010}}</ref> On September 24, 2010, District Judge [[Ronald B. Leighton]] ruled that Witt's constitutional rights had been violated by her discharge and that she must be reinstated to the Air Force.<ref name="judgeorders">{{cite news |last= Johnson |first= Gene |agency=[[Associated Press]] |title= Judge orders lesbian reinstated to Air Force β Case challenges 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy |work= [[NBC News]] |date= September 24, 2010 |url= https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39349633 |access-date= September 24, 2010 }}</ref> The government filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit on November 23, but did not attempt to have the trial court's ruling stayed pending the outcome.<ref>{{cite news|title=DOJ Appeals Lesbian's Reinstatement to Air Force|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-appeals-lesbians-reinstatement-to-air-force/|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130119060615/http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-7084333.html|url-status=live|archive-date=January 19, 2013|access-date=December 29, 2012|newspaper=CBS News|date=November 24, 2010}}</ref> In a settlement announced on May 10, 2011, the Air Force agreed to drop its appeal and remove Witt's discharge from her military record. She will retire with full benefits.<ref>''Seattle Post Intelligencer'': Pulkkinnen, Levi (May 10, 2011). [http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Pentagon-settles-with-McChord-major-fired-for-1373728.php "Pentagon settles with McChord major fired for being lesbian"]. Retrieved May 12, 2011</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Don't ask, don't tell
(section)
Add topic