Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Copenhagen interpretation
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Probabilities via the Born rule === {{Main|Born rule}} The [[Born rule]] is essential to the Copenhagen interpretation.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Bohr|first1=N.|year=1928|title=The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=121|issue=3050|pages=580β590|bibcode=1928Natur.121..580B|doi=10.1038/121580a0|doi-access=free}}, p. 586: "In this connexion [Born] succeeded in obtaining a statistical interpretation of the wave functions, allowing a calculation of the probability of the individual transition processes required by the quantum postulate."</ref> Formulated by [[Max Born]] in 1926, it gives the [[probability]] that a [[measurement in quantum mechanics|measurement of a quantum system]] will yield a given result. In its simplest form, it states that the probability density of finding a particle at a given point, when measured, is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the particle's wave function at that point.{{refn|group=note|While Born himself described his contribution as the "statistical interpretation" of the wave function,<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Born|first1=M.|author-link=Max Born|year=1955|title=Statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics|journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] |volume=122|issue=3172|pages=675β679|bibcode=1955Sci...122..675B|doi=10.1126/science.122.3172.675|pmid=17798674}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|quote=... the statistical interpretation, which I have first suggested and which has been formulated in the most general way by von Neumann, ...|author-link=Max Born |last=Born |first=M. |year=1953 |title=The interpretation of quantum mechanics |journal=[[British Journal for the Philosophy of Science]] |volume=4 |number=14 |pages=95β106|doi=10.1093/bjps/IV.14.95 }}</ref> the term "statistical interpretation" has also been used as a synonym for the [[ensemble interpretation]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Ballentine|first1=L.E.|year=1970|title=The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics|url=http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/65291|journal=[[Reviews of Modern Physics]] |volume=42|issue=4|pages=358β381|bibcode=1970RvMP...42..358B|doi=10.1103/revmodphys.42.358|s2cid=120024263 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author-link=Max Born |last=Born |first=M. |year=1949 |chapter=Einstein's statistical theories |title=Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist |editor-first=P. A. |editor-last=Schilpp |editor-link=Paul Arthur Schilpp |publisher=Open Court |location=La Salle IL |volume=1 |pages=161β177}}</ref>}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Copenhagen interpretation
(section)
Add topic