Editing Anytus (section)

== Trial of Socrates ==
In 399 BC, Anytus joined Meletus and Lycon in bringing an indictment against Socrates.<ref>Plato, ''Apology'', iii; Diodorus Siculus, xiv.37.7; Xenophon, ''Apology'', 29.</ref> We have two statements that purport to quote the specific charges, one from Plato and another from [[Diogenes Laertius]]. In his ''[[Apology (Plato)|Apology]]'', Plato had Socrates read out the complaint:
<blockquote>Socrates is guilty of criminal meddling in that he inquires into things below the earth and in the sky, and makes the weaker argument defeat the stronger, and teaches others to follow his example.<ref>Plato, ''Apology'', 19b.</ref></blockquote>
Diogenes, on the other hand, wrote:
<blockquote>The affidavit in the case, which is still preserved, says [[Favorinus]], in the {{ill|Metroon (Athens)|de|Metroon (Athen)|lt=Metroon}}, ran as follows: “This indictment and affidavit is sworn by Meletus, the son of Meletus of Pitthos, against Socrates, the son of Sophroniscus of [[Alopece]]: Socrates is guilty of refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state, and of introducing other new divinities. He is also guilty of corrupting the youth. The penalty demanded is death.”<ref>Diogenes Laërtius, ''Lives of the Eminent Philosophers'', ii.40.</ref></blockquote>The discrepancies between these accounts have generated much discussion among modern scholars. As such, the motivation of his accusers has been an issue for modern scholars. Foremost among the explanations proffered was Athens’ recent experience with overthrows and attempted overthrows of its democracy: the coup of the [[Athenian coup of 411 BC|Four Hundred]] in 411, that of the Thirty in 404, and the attempted reimposition of that oligarchy in 401 by the remnants of the Thirty living at [[Elefsina|Eleusis]]. The prejudice against Socrates was not so much about his religious beliefs as about his impact on Athenian politics – namely that he was well known for favoring Spartan society over Athenian and that among the leaders of the coups were men who had spent considerable time with him in their youth. Among the most prominent of these were [[Theramenes]], [[Critias]], and [[Charmides]].<ref>For discussion of these issues see I. F. Stone, ''The Trial of Socrates'', chapters 10 to 13.</ref> As a latter-day democrat,<ref>Anytus had not always opposed a restricted franchise. See the ''Atheneion Politeia'' §34.3 where he was listed along with Theramenes and others as favoring a return to the “ancient constitution” after the loss to Sparta in the Peloponnesian War.</ref> and one who had fought against the Thirty at Phyle and [[Piraeus|Peiraieus]], Anytus would certainly have supported any effort to get rid of persons who directly or indirectly were responsible for these violent attacks on Athens’ government. But in Socrates’ case, he may have had more personal motives. Both Plato and Xenophon related events where enmity between the two men was on display. In ''Meno'' Plato constructed a conversation between them where Socrates was exploring the inability of the great men of Athens to pass on their excellence to their sons. [[Themistocles]], [[Aristides|Aristeides]], Pericles, and [[Thucydides, son of Melesias|Thucydides]] (son of Melesias, not the historian) were his examples – men whom one would think would have included ethical education among those subjects taught to them. Since they did not, Socrates reluctantly drew the inference that virtue could not be taught. Anytus, however, drew the inference that Socrates was criticizing them (and himself, presumably) for not making the effort.<blockquote>Socrates, I consider you are too apt to speak ill of people. I, for one, if you will take my advice, would warn you to be careful: in most cities it is probably easier to do people harm than good, and particularly in this one; I think you know that yourself.<ref>Plato, ''Meno'', 94e. This comment is generally taken to be a foreshadowing of Anytus’ prosecution of Socrates.</ref></blockquote>Antyus left the conversation at this point, and Socrates said to Meno:<blockquote>Meno, I think Anytus is angry, and I am not at all surprised: for he conceives, in the first place, that I am speaking ill of these gentlemen; and in the second place, he considers he is one of them himself.<ref>Plato, ''Meno'', 94e-95a.</ref></blockquote>[[Xenophon]] provided the background for Anytus’ sensitivity on this issue.<blockquote>It is said also that [Socrates] remarked as he saw Anytus passing by: “There goes a man who is filled with pride at the thought that he has accomplished some great and noble end in putting me to death, because, seeing him honored by the state with the highest offices, I said that he ought not to confine his son's education to hides [i.e., the tanning business]…

“At one time I had a brief association with the son of Anytus, and I thought him not lacking in firmness of spirit; and so I predict that he will not continue in the servile occupation that his father has provided for him; but through want of a worthy adviser he will fall into some disgraceful propensity and will surely go far in the career of vice.”

In saying this he was not mistaken; the young man, delighting in wine, never left off drinking night or day, and at last turned out worth nothing to his city, his friends, or himself.<ref>Xenophon, ''Apology'', 29-31.</ref></blockquote>Xenophon was not in Athens at this time; he was in Asia on a military campaign,<ref>See Xenophon’s ''Anabasis'' for details.</ref> so this is hearsay and probably not a verbatim quote. In this case, it is likely that Anytus lost the affection and respect of his son and blamed Socrates for it – in his eyes, probably sufficient reason to join in his prosecution. The scholiast to Plato’s ''Apology'' (18b), cited in note 3 above, provided some additional background:<blockquote>[Anytus] was rich from his tanning business, for which he was mocked by Socrates. Because of this mockery Anytus persuaded Meletus by bribing him to bring a charge of impiety against Socrates.</blockquote>Adding all this up, it seems Anytus had both political and personal reasons for wanting Socrates out of the way. As for Meletus’ and Lycon’s motives, we have only what Socrates said about the former in Plato’s ''[[Euthyphro]]'':<blockquote>I am not too clear about the man myself, Euthyphro. He appears to me to be a young man, and unknown. I think however, thet they call him Meletus, and his deme is Pitthos, if you happen to know anyone named Meletus of that deme – a hook-nosed man with long, straight hair, and not much beard… He says, in fact, that he knows the method by which young people are corrupted, and knows who the persons are that do it… And so Meletus no doubt begins by clearing us away, the ones who ruin, as he says, the tender shoots of the young... With such a notable beginning, his chances of success look good.<ref>Plato, ''Euthyphro'', 2b-3a.</ref></blockquote>If the scholiast is correct, Meletus’ desire to keep the young from corruption was aided by a little corruptive bribery by Anytus. His “chances of success” were, in the end, in some doubt. In the aftermath of Socrates’ conviction and execution, there are stories of the remorse felt by the citizens of Athens and the punishments they meted out on his accusers. Diogenes Laërtius said:<blockquote>So [Socrates] was taken from among men; and not long afterwards the Athenians felt such remorse that they shut up the training grounds and gymnasia. They banished the other accusers, but put Meletus to death; they honoured Socrates with a bronze statue, the work of Lysippus, which they placed in the hall of processions. And no sooner did Anytus visit Heraclea<ref>There are several ancient cities of this name. Which is meant is not indicated.</ref> than the people of that town expelled him on that very day.<ref>Diogenes Laërtius, ''Lives'', ii.43.</ref></blockquote>In another place, Diogenes credited [[Antisthenes]], the cynic philosopher and former protégé of Socrates, with initiating these reprisals.<ref>Diogenes, vi.9-10.</ref> The 4th century CE orator [[Themistius]] went so far as to claim that the people of Heraclea, rather than expel Anytus, stoned him to death on arrival.<ref>Cited in Stone, p. 176 and Tell, last paragraph.</ref>

These vignettes may simply be the inventions of later apologists for Socrates, for there is evidence that Anytus remained in Athens for some years. The ''[[Hellenica Oxyrhynchia|Hellenica Oxyrhinchia]]'' places him at a meeting of the Athenian Assembly (''[[Ecclesia (ancient Greece)|Ecclesia]]'') in 397/6 BC<ref>''Hellenica Oxyrhinchia'', vi.1-3; Devlin, p. 207.</ref> and Lysias, in one of his forensic orations, has the speaker call Anytus, who was serving as grain inspector at the time, as a witness in a trial that took place in 388 BC.<ref>Lysias, ''Against the Corn Dealers'', xxii.8-9.</ref> Both of these events were long after any retribution for his prosecution of Socrates would have been meted out. Furthermore, in 336/5 BC, two men, Anytus (II) and Anthemion (II), of the same deme as our subject, served on the Athenian Council of 500 (''[[Boule (ancient Greece)|Boule]]''). This Anytus also served as ''trierarch''in 323/2 BC.<ref>Chariontides, p. 36, 37.</ref> If they were, indeed descendants, it would argue against Anytus I having been forcibly exiled, as his son (and any other issue) would have lost citizenship rights in the process.