Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Open Shortest Path First
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Applications== OSPF is a widely deployed routing protocol that can converge a network in a few seconds and guarantee loop-free paths. It has many features that allow the imposition of policies about the propagation of routes that it may be appropriate to keep local, for load sharing, and for selective route importing. IS-IS, in contrast, can be tuned for lower overhead in a stable network, the sort more common in ISP than enterprise networks. There are some historical accidents that made IS-IS the preferred IGP for ISPs, but ISPs today may well choose to use the features of the now-efficient implementations of OSPF,<ref>{{Cite conference | first = Howard | last = Berkowitz | title = OSPF Goodies for ISPs | url = https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1149 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160612140344/https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1149 | archive-date = 2016-06-12 | conference = North American Network Operators Group NANOG 17 | year = 1999 | place = Montreal }}</ref> after first considering the pros and cons of IS-IS in service provider environments.<ref>{{Cite conference | first = Dave | last = Katz | title = OSPF and IS-IS: A Comparative Anatomy | url = https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1084 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180620232619/https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1084 | archive-date = 2018-06-20 | conference = North American Network Operators Group NANOG 19 | year = 2000 | place = Albuquerque }}</ref> {{Citation needed span|text=OSPF can provide better load-sharing on external links than other IGPs.|date=September 2023}} When the default route to an ISP is injected into OSPF from multiple ASBRs as a Type I external route and the same external cost specified, other routers will go to the ASBR with the least path cost from its location. This can be tuned further by adjusting the external cost. If the default route from different ISPs is injected with different external costs, as a Type II external route, the lower-cost default becomes the primary exit and the higher-cost becomes the backup only.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Open Shortest Path First
(section)
Add topic