Editing Medication (section)

===Access to unapproved drugs===
{{Main|Expanded access}}
Governments worldwide have created provisions for granting access to drugs prior to approval for patients who have exhausted all alternative treatment options and do not match clinical trial entry criteria. Often grouped under the labels of compassionate use, [[expanded access]], or named patient supply, these programs are governed by rules which vary by country defining access criteria, data collection, promotion, and control of drug distribution.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Helene S |title=EU Compassionate Use Programmes (CUPs): Regulatory Framework and Points to Consider before CUP Implementation |journal=Pharm Med |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=223–229 |year=2010 |doi=10.1007/bf03256820 |s2cid=31439802 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

Within the United States, pre-approval demand is generally met through [[treatment IND]] (investigational new drug) applications (INDs), or single-patient INDs. These mechanisms, which fall under the label of expanded access programs, provide access to drugs for groups of patients or individuals residing in the US. Outside the US, Named Patient Programs provide controlled, pre-approval access to drugs in response to requests by physicians on behalf of specific, or "named", patients before those medicines are licensed in the patient's home country.  Through these programs, patients are able to access drugs in late-stage clinical trials or approved in other countries for a genuine, unmet medical need, before those drugs have been licensed in the patient's home country.{{cn|date=May 2023}}

Patients who have not been able to get access to drugs in development have organized and advocated for greater access.  In the United States, [[ACT UP]] formed in the 1980s, and eventually formed its [[Treatment Action Group]] in part to pressure the US government to put more resources into discovering treatments for AIDS and then to speed release of drugs that were under development.<ref>{{cite news |first=Gina |last=Kolata |work=The New York Times |date=12 September 1994 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/12/us/fda-debate-on-speedy-access-to-aids-drugs-is-reopening.html |title=F.D.A. Debate on Speedy Access to AIDS Drugs Is Reopening |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701041550/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/12/us/fda-debate-on-speedy-access-to-aids-drugs-is-reopening.html |archive-date=1 July 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

The [[Abigail Alliance]] was established in November 2001 by Frank Burroughs in memory of his daughter, Abigail.<ref>{{cite journal
 |last=Phillips |first=Lisa |date=4 September 2008 |title=Contract Law and Ethical Issues Underscore the Latest Lawsuit About Access to Experimental Drugs for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy |journal=Neurology Today |volume=8 |issue=17 |pages=20–21 |doi= 10.1097/01.nt.0000337676.20893.50}}</ref> The Alliance seeks broader availability of investigational drugs on behalf of terminally ill patients.

In 2013, [[BioMarin Pharmaceutical]] was at the center of a high-profile debate regarding expanded access of cancer patients to experimental drugs.<ref>{{cite news | title = Andrea Sloan Faces Pharma Firm With History of Indifference | date = 26 September 2013 | url = http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/26/andrea-sloan-biomarin_n_3997527.html | work = Huffington Post | access-date = 24 December 2013 | archive-date = 25 December 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131225134640/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/26/andrea-sloan-biomarin_n_3997527.html | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = In cancer drug battle, both sides appeal to ethics | date = 20 September 2013 | url = http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/28/health/compassionate-drug-use/ | work = CNN | access-date = 24 December 2013 | archive-date = 25 December 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131225100423/http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/28/health/compassionate-drug-use/ | url-status = live }}</ref>