Editing Daily Mail (section)

===Racism accusations===
There have been accusations of racism against the ''Daily Mail''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/03/best-way-angry-daily-mail|title=The best way to get angry with the Daily Mail? Don't buy it|date=3 August 2012|newspaper=The Guardian|issn=0261-3077|access-date=4 April 2016|archive-date=7 May 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170507225502/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/03/best-way-angry-daily-mail|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2012, in an article for ''[[The New Yorker]]'', former ''Mail'' reporter Brendan Montague criticised the ''Mail'''s content and culture, stating: "None of the front-line reporters I worked with were racist, but there's [[institutional racism]] [at the ''Daily Mail'']".<ref name="Mail Supremacy"/>

In August 2020, a group of [[Great Palm Island|Palm Islanders]] in [[Queensland]], Australia, lodged a complaint with the [[Australian Human Rights Commission]] under [[Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975|Section 18C of the ''Racial Discrimination Act 1975'']] against the ''Daily Mail'' and [[Nine News|9News]], alleging that they had broadcast and published reports that were inaccurate and racist about the [[Indigenous Australian]] recipients of compensation after the [[Palm Island Class Action]].<ref>{{cite web | title=Nine News Palm Island investigation reveals people awarded money went out and spent it | first=Amanda | last=Meade | website=The Guardian | date=22 May 2020 | url=http://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/may/22/nine-news-palm-island-investigation-reveals-people-awarded-money-went-out-and-spent-it | access-date=25 August 2020 | archive-date=24 August 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200824033319/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/may/22/nine-news-palm-island-investigation-reveals-people-awarded-money-went-out-and-spent-it | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=Stackpool | first=Isabelle | title=Much of $30 million compensation given after Palm Island riots was frittered away on luxury goods | website=Daily Mail Online | date=19 May 2020 | url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8333903/Much-30-million-compensation-given-Palm-Island-riots-frittered-away-luxury-goods.html | access-date=25 August 2020 | archive-date=6 August 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806164955/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8333903/Much-30-million-compensation-given-Palm-Island-riots-frittered-away-luxury-goods.html | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=abcaug>{{cite news | title=Palm Islanders to launch action against Channel Nine, Daily Mail over 'racist' reports | first=Sofie | last=Wainwright | website=ABC News | publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date=20 August 2020 | url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-21/palm-islanders-accuse-nine-and-daily-mail-of-racist-reporting/12578088 | access-date=25 August 2020 | archive-date=21 August 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200821144538/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-21/palm-islanders-accuse-nine-and-daily-mail-of-racist-reporting/12578088 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=guardaug>{{cite web | title=Palm Island residents launch human rights complaint over 'racist' Channel Nine and Daily Mail reports | first=Amanda | last=Meade | website=The Guardian | date=21 August 2020 | url=http://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/aug/21/palm-island-residents-launch-human-rights-complaint-over-racist-channel-nine-and-daily-mail-reports | access-date=25 August 2020 | archive-date=25 August 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200825005840/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/aug/21/palm-island-residents-launch-human-rights-complaint-over-racist-channel-nine-and-daily-mail-reports | url-status=live }}</ref>

In 2021, IPSO ruled that the ''Daily Mail'' dishonestly published a headline falsely claiming to report on "British towns that are no-go areas for white people".<ref>{{cite web |title=06134-21 Vass v Mail Online |url=https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=06134-21 |publisher=IPSO |access-date=30 December 2021 |archive-date=23 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211223125821/https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=06134-21 |url-status=live }}</ref> The town showcased was the wealthy Manchester suburb of [[Didsbury]], which it had described the previous month as "posh and leafy" and a "property hotspot".<ref>{{cite web |title=MailOnline mocked for suggesting Didsbury is 'no go' area for white people |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/06/mailonline-mocked-for-suggesting-didsbury-is-no-go-area-for-white-people |website=The Guardian |access-date=30 December 2021 |language=en |date=6 June 2021 |archive-date=7 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210607125511/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/06/mailonline-mocked-for-suggesting-didsbury-is-no-go-area-for-white-people |url-status=live }}</ref>