Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
GCSE
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Errors and mistakes === Teachers and pupils have the option to question exam results and have the scripts marked again if they feel the grade awarded does not reflect the pupil's ability and expectations; or if they review a copy of the script and notice a marking error. In recent years, there have been complaints that GCSEs and GCE A-Levels were marked unfairly. (In 2012, for the first time in the history of the exams, the proportion of all GCSEs awarded an A*βC grade fell).<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19355956|title=Anger over 'harsh' English GCSE grades|date=23 August 2012|publisher=BBC News|access-date=14 June 2015}}</ref> This can be seen as, in general, more appeals being submitted each year; however, the appeals rarely result in any grade changes as only 182 out of 6.2 million (0.003%) grades were changed in England in 2018, with most upheld appeals ending in no change of marks.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/794519/Appeals_for_GCSE__AS_and_A_level_summer_2018_exam_series.pdf|title=Appeals for GCSE, AS and A level Summer 2018 Exam Series}}</ref> In one incident concerning the 2016 GCSE biology exam, there were complaints about the apparent lack of biology content in the exam.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/this-gcse-biology-exam-that-left-students-tears-could-you-answer-questions-1561200|title=This is the GCSE biology exam that left students in tears: Could you answer the questions?|date=20 May 2016|work=International Business Times UK|access-date=21 May 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date=17 May 2016 |title=Students left 'fuming' over GCSE biology exam that contained questions about drunk 15-year-olds |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2016/05/17/students-left-fuming-over-gcse-biology-exam-that-contained-quest/ |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=11 October 2017 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2016/05/17/students-left-fuming-over-gcse-biology-exam-that-contained-quest/ |archive-date=11 January 2022}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date=17 May 2016 |title=Fury over GCSE biology exam that had 'no biology' in it |work=[[Metro (British newspaper)|Metro]] |url=http://metro.co.uk/2016/05/17/fury-over-gcse-biology-exam-that-had-no-biology-in-it-5888645/ |access-date=11 October 2017}}</ref> One of the questions in the biology exam asked students to define an "[[independent company]]", which some students perceived to be a business studies question.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/may/17/gcse-exam-pupils-baffled-by-business-studies-question-in-biology-paper|title=GCSE exam pupils baffled by 'business studies' question in biology paper|date=17 May 2016|work=The Guardian|access-date=11 October 2017|agency=[[Press Association]]}}</ref> The May 2017 English literature exam (under the regulation of OCR) wrongly implied that [[Tybalt]], a character in ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]'', was not a [[Capulet]]. This serious flaw in the question confused many of the students. OCR accepted responsibility and claimed no pupil would be disadvantaged. The question was worth 40 marks, a relatively large number of marks.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |first= |date=26 May 2017 |title=A plague o' both your houses: error in GCSE exam paper forces apology |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/may/26/error-gcse-paper-leads-to-apology-ocr-exam-board-romeo-and-juliet-tybalt-shakespeare |access-date=15 December 2018 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> In 2022, advance information was given by examination boards to students, providing them with information on what topics would or would not be on the exam. However, in the Physics paper 1 exam, a topic that was stated as "Not Assessed" came up; AQA accepted the mistake and awarded all students the full 9 marks to the question.<ref>{{Cite web |title=An update on GCSE Physics Higher Tier Paper 1 |url=https://www.aqa.org.uk/news/an-update-on-gcse-physics-higher-tier-paper-1 |access-date=2022-06-25 |publisher=AQA |language=en}}</ref> Also, in 2022, a question on one of the higher Maths papers was leaked hours before students sat them. The exam board [[Edexcel]] apologised and conducted a full investigation.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/general/gcses-2022-fine-boards-over-exam-paper-errors-say-mps | title=Exam paper errors: Plea for action }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
GCSE
(section)
Add topic