Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Three utilities problem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Unsolvability=== [[File:3_utilities_problem_proof.svg|thumb|[[Proof without words]]: One house is temporarily deleted. The lines connecting the remaining houses with the utilities divide the plane into three regions. Whichever region the deleted house is placed into, the similarly shaded utility is outside the region. By the [[Jordan curve theorem]], a line connecting them must intersect one of the existing lines.]] As it is usually presented (on a flat two-dimensional plane), the solution to the utility puzzle is "no": there is no way to make all nine connections without any of the lines crossing each other. In other words, the graph <math>K_{3,3}</math> is not planar. [[Kazimierz Kuratowski]] stated in 1930 that <math>K_{3,3}</math> is nonplanar,{{r|kuratowski}} from which it follows that the problem has no solution. {{harvtxt|Kullman|1979}}, however, states that "Interestingly enough, Kuratowski did not publish a detailed proof that [ <math>K_{3,3}</math> ] is non-planar".{{r|kullman1979}} One proof of the impossibility of finding a planar embedding of <math>K_{3,3}</math> uses a case analysis involving the [[Jordan curve theorem]].{{r|ayres}} In this solution, one examines different possibilities for the locations of the vertices with respect to the 4-cycles of the graph and shows that they are all inconsistent with a planar embedding.{{r|trudeau}} Alternatively, it is possible to show that any [[bridgeless graph|bridgeless]] [[bipartite graph|bipartite]] planar graph with <math>V</math> vertices and <math>E</math> edges has <math>E\le 2V-4</math> by combining the [[Euler characteristic|Euler formula]] <math>V-E+F=2</math> (where <math>F</math> is the number of faces of a planar embedding) with the observation that the number of faces is at most half the number of edges (the vertices around each face must alternate between houses and utilities, so each face has at least four edges, and each edge belongs to exactly two faces). In the utility graph, <math>E=9</math> and <math>2V-4=8</math> so in the utility graph it is untrue that <math>E\le 2V-4</math>. Because it does not satisfy this inequality, the utility graph cannot be planar.{{r|kappraff}}{{Clear|left}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Three utilities problem
(section)
Add topic