Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
The Big Fisherman
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== ''Variety'' called it "pious but plodding."<ref>[https://archive.org/details/variety215-1959-07/page/n6/mode/1up?q=%22john+saxon%22 Review of film] at ''Variety''</ref> ''[[Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide]]'' (2012 edition) gave ''The Big Fisherman'' 2Β½ stars out of 4, describing it as a "sprawling religious epic" and deciding that it is "seldom dull, but not terribly inspiring." ''[[Steven H. Scheuer's Movies on TV and Videocassette]]'' (1993β1994 edition) also settled on 2Β½ stars out of 4, writing that "the story of Simon called Peter" "unfolds with predictable pageantry and uplifting sermonizing". Assigning 2 stars (out of 5), ''[[The Motion Picture Guide]]'' (1987 edition) found it to be "long, often-enraging and totally miscast" with "a nonsinging Keel as Saint Peter". Evaluating the presentation as "just so much biblical nonsense because such liberties are taken that any serious student of the life and surrounding events will take exception," the write-up declares that "Douglas wrote the novel but made the mistake of entrusting it to the wrong people." After pointing out the film's "numerous technical mistakes: microphone boom shadows, klieg lights, Martha Hyer's vaccination mark", the ''Guide'' concludes that "to make a love story the focal point of such a potentially dynamic saga of history's most memorable era was a bad decision. One of the rare bummers by Disney in those years."<ref>''The Motion Picture Guide'' (Chicago, 1987), volume I, page 193</ref> [[Leslie Halliwell]] in his ''Film and Video Guide'' (5th edition, 1985) dismissed it as a "well-meaning but leaden adaptation of a bestselling novel which followed on from ''The Robe''. He concluded that it is "too reverent by half, and in many respects surprisingly incompetent." Halliwell's quoted ''[[Monthly Film Bulletin]]'' ("its overall flatness of conception and execution is a stiff price to pay for the lack of spectacular [[sensationalism]] characterizing its fellow-epics") and ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'' ("the picture is three hours long, and, except for those who can be dazzled by big gatherings of props, horses and camels, it is hard to find three minutes of entertainment in it").
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
The Big Fisherman
(section)
Add topic