Editing Spatial anti-aliasing (section)

==Two dimensional considerations==
[[Image:Sinc(x) x sinc(y) plot.jpg|thumb|Sinc function, with separate X and Y]]
The previous discussion assumes that the rectangular mesh sampling is the dominant part of the problem. The filter usually considered optimal is not rotationally symmetrical, as shown in this first figure; this is because the data is sampled on a [[square lattice]], not using a continuous image.  This sampling pattern is the justification for doing signal processing along each axis, as it is traditionally done on one dimensional data. [[Lanczos resampling]] is based on convolution of the data with a discrete representation of the sinc function.

If the resolution is not limited by the rectangular sampling rate of either the source or target image, then one should ideally use rotationally symmetrical filter or interpolation functions, as though the data were a two dimensional function of continuous x and y. The sinc function of the radius has too long a tail to make a good filter (it is not even [[square-integrable]]).  A more appropriate analog to the one-dimensional sinc is the two-dimensional [[Airy disc]] amplitude, the 2D Fourier transform of a circular region in 2D frequency space, as opposed to a square region.

[[Image:Gaussian plus its own curvature.jpg|thumb|Gaussian plus differential function]]
One might consider a Gaussian plus enough of its second derivative to flatten the top (in the frequency domain) or sharpen it up (in the spatial domain), as shown. Functions based on the Gaussian function are natural choices, because convolution with a Gaussian gives another Gaussian whether applied to x and y or to the radius. Similarly to wavelets, another of its properties is that it is halfway between being localized in the configuration (x and y) and in the spectral (j and k) representation. As an interpolation function, a Gaussian alone seems too spread out to preserve the maximum possible detail, and thus the second derivative is added.

As an example, when printing a photographic negative with plentiful processing capability and on a printer with a hexagonal pattern, there is no reason to use sinc function interpolation. Such interpolation would treat diagonal lines differently from horizontal and vertical lines, which is like a weak form of aliasing.