Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Space Shuttle Columbia
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Weight=== As the second orbiter to be constructed and the first able to fly into space, ''Columbia'' was roughly {{convert|8000|lb|abbr=on}} heavier than subsequent orbiters such as [[Space Shuttle Endeavour|''Endeavour'']] when she was first constructed, which had benefited from advances in materials technology.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/features/000414overhaul/weightloss.html |title=Orbiter Overhaul: The Columbia weight loss plan |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=April 14, 2000 |access-date=July 17, 2009}}</ref> In part, this was due to heavier wing and fuselage spars, the weight of early test instrumentation that remained fitted to the avionics suite, and an internal airlock that, originally fitted into the other orbiters, was later removed in favor of an external airlock to facilitate Shuttle/[[Mir]] and Shuttle/[[International Space Station]] dockings.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/features/000414overhaul/future.html |title=Orbiter Overhaul: Flying into the future |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=April 14, 2000 |access-date=July 17, 2009}}</ref>.''Columbia'' was not modified for the planned [[Centaur (rocket stage)|Centaur-G]] booster (canceled after the loss of ''Challenger'').<ref>{{cite book|last=Lardas|first=Mark|title=Space Shuttle Launch System: 1972-2004|year=2012|publisher=Osprey Publishing|pages=35}}</ref> The retention of the internal airlock allowed NASA to use ''Columbia'' for the [[STS-109]] [[Hubble Space Telescope]] servicing mission, along with the [[Astrotech Corporation|Spacehab]] double module used on [[STS-107]].{{Citation needed|date=December 2017|reason=An external airlock would have fit fine on Columbia's last two missions, but there was no need. Columbia would have carried Endeavour's external airlock on its next mission (to ISS) if they had made it home safely from STS-107.}} Due to ''Columbia's'' higher weight, it was less ideal for NASA to use it for missions to the International Space Station due the performance decreases needed to carry the heavy payloads to the high inclination orbit, though modifications were made to the Shuttle during its last refit in case the spacecraft was needed for such tasks.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Space Shuttle Columbia
(section)
Add topic