Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Rotary engine
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Advantages and drawbacks=== Three key factors contributed to the rotary engine's success at the time:<ref>''Air Board Technical Notes'', RAF Air Board, 1917. Reprinted by Camden Miniature Steam Services, 1997</ref> * Smooth running: Rotaries delivered power very smoothly because (relative to the engine mounting point) there are no reciprocating parts, and the relatively large rotating mass of the crankcase/cylinders (as a unit) acted as a [[flywheel]]. * Improved cooling: when the engine was running, the rotating crankcase/cylinder assembly created its own fast-moving cooling [[Aerodynamics|airflow]], even with the aircraft at rest. * Weight advantage: rotaries shared with other radial configuration engines the advantage of a small, flat crankcase. The superior air-cooling imparted by the moving engine also meant that cylinders could be made with thinner walls and shallower cooling fins. Their [[power-to-weight ratio]] was further enhanced in comparison with engines that required an added flywheel for smooth running. Engine designers had always been aware of the many limitations of the rotary engine, so when static style engines became more reliable and gave better specific weights and fuel consumption, the days of the rotary engine were numbered. * Rotary engines had a fundamentally inefficient [[total-loss oiling system]]. In order to reach the whole engine, the lubricating medium needed to enter the crankcase through the hollow crankshaft; but the centrifugal force of the revolving crankcase was directly opposed to any re-circulation. The only practical solution was for the lubricant to be aspirated with the fuel/air mixture, as in most [[two-stroke engines]]. * Power increase also came with mass and size increases,<ref>for instance, compare [[Gnome Monosoupape]] to [[Bentley BR2]]</ref> multiplying [[gyroscopic precession]] from the rotating mass of the engine. Thus aircraft with these engines had stability and control problems, especially for inexperienced pilots. * Power output increasingly went into overcoming the air resistance of the spinning engine. * Engine controls were tricky (see below), and resulted in fuel waste. The late [[World War I]] [[Bentley BR2]] was the largest and most powerful rotary engine; it reached a point beyond which this type of engine could not be further developed,<ref>{{cite book |last= Gunston |first= Bill |title=World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines |year=1986 |publisher=Patrick Stephens |location= Wellingborough |pages=22β26}}</ref> and it was the last of its kind to be adopted into RAF service.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Rotary engine
(section)
Add topic