Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Robert Andrews Millikan
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Data selection controversy ==== There is some controversy over selectivity in Millikan's use of results from his second experiment measuring the electron charge. This issue has been discussed by [[Allan Franklin]],<ref> {{cite journal |last=Franklin |first=A. |title=Millikan's Oil-Drop Experiments |journal=[[The Chemical Educator]] |volume=2 |issue=1 |date=1997 |pages=1β14 |doi=10.1007/s00897970102a |s2cid=97609199 }}</ref> a former high-energy experimentalist and current philosopher of science at the [[University of Colorado at Boulder|University of Colorado]]. Franklin contends that Millikan's exclusions of data do not affect the final value of the charge obtained, but that Millikan's substantial "cosmetic surgery" reduced the statistical error. This enabled Millikan to give the charge of the electron to better than one-half of one percent. In fact, if Millikan had included all of the data he discarded, the error would have been less than 2%. While this would still have resulted in Millikan's having measured the charge of ''e<sup>β</sup>'' better than anyone else at the time, the slightly larger uncertainty might have allowed more disagreement with his results within the physics community, which Millikan likely tried to avoid. [[David Goodstein]] argues that Millikan's statement, that all drops observed over a 60 day period were used in the paper, was clarified in a subsequent sentence that specified all "drops upon which complete series of observations were made". Goodstein attests that this is indeed the case and notes that five pages of tables separate the two sentences.<ref> {{cite web |url = http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/4014/1/Millikan.pdf |title = In defense of Robert Andrews Millikan |first = David |last = Goodstein |date = 2000 |work = Engineering and Science |publisher = California Institute of Technology |location = Pasadena, California |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100625194742/http://eands.caltech.edu/articles/Millikan%20Feature.pdf |archive-date = June 25, 2010 |access-date = August 30, 2018 |url-status = dead }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Robert Andrews Millikan
(section)
Add topic