Editing Private copying levy (section)

==Legal effects==
It is theorized that such levy may be linked to a corresponding relaxation of [[copyright]] law, by permitting the recording of copyrighted works on media for which the tax has been paid. However, there is little evidence to support this theory. On the contrary, lobbyists representing publishers and copyright holders have increased pressures to implement more restrictive laws, even on countries that have implemented private copying levy. In 2007, it was reported that International Intellectual Property Alliance put 23 of the world's 30 most populous countries into Priority Watch List, even though the United States, which was not in the list, has laws that are more liberal than the laws from the countries within the list.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1679/1 |title=In Good Company |date=February 14, 2007 |publisher=[[Michael Geist]] |accessdate=2008-04-16 |archive-date=15 April 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415050116/http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1679/1/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

Even when restricting levy system to devices that primarily play music, this itself creates loopholes that prevents collecting levies from cellphones, PDAs, and other all-in-one portable electronic devices. As a result, copyright holders will have to rely on even more laws to collect levy, and to increase rates of already levied product to recover perceived losses, which run against the political trends toward eliminating levy systems.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1708/159/ |title=Recording Industry's Digital Strategy Out of Tune |date=February 19, 2007 |publisher=Michael Geist |accessdate=2008-04-16 |archive-date=14 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130314012632/http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1708/159/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>