Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Parliamentary procedure
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Other=== The [[Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union]] (1957) states<ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-06-07 |title=Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Part 6, Title I, Chapter 1, Section 1, Articles 232, 240, and 249 |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2016/art_232/oj |access-date=2024-06-11 |website=EUR-Lex |language=en}}</ref> that each of the [[European Parliament]], [[Council of the European Union]], and [[European Commission]] adopt their own rules. For the Parliament, these are the [[Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament]]. The procedures of the [[Diet of Japan]] moved away from the British parliamentary model, when in [[Occupied Japan]], there were efforts to align Japanese parliamentary procedures with American congressional practices.<ref>Reischauer, Edwin O. and Marius B. Jansen. (1977). [https://books.google.com/books?id=BTPNlLIy2soC&pg=PA250&dq= ''The Japanese Today: Change and Continuity,'' p. 250].</ref> In Japan, informal negotiations are more important than formal procedures.<ref>Mulgan, Aurelia George. (2000). [https://books.google.com/books?id=l_78iQKtaJMC&pg=PA292&dq= ''The Politics of Agriculture in Japan,'' p. 292].</ref> In Italy, written rules govern the [[Italian Parliament|Houses of the Parliament]]. The [[Constitutional Court of Italy|Constitutional Court]] judges the limits beyond which these regulations cannot go, exceeding the parliamentary or political function (judgement n. 120 of 2014)<ref>The "functionalist" criterion (set by the Bill, on the initiative of Senator Maritati: Bill n. 1560/XVI) identified β inside parliamentary Institutions β acts of political bodies which, on the one hand, are not linked to the functions (legislative, political address or inspection) but which, on the other hand, are not classified as high-level administration: {{cite journal|last1=Buonomo|first1=Giampiero|title=Il nodo dell'autodichia da Ponzio a Pilato|journal=Golem Informazione|date=2014|url=https://www.questia.com/projects#!/project/89413589|access-date=2016-04-11|archive-date=2016-03-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160324160801/https://www.questia.com/projects#!/project/89413589|url-status=dead}}</ref> and on their bad application when a law is passed.<ref>{{in lang|it}} [https://www.academia.edu/38400055/La_Corte_costituzionale_ancora_irrisolta_sul_ricorso_delle_minoranze_parlamentari_coautore_M._Cerase_ G. Buonomo e M. Cerase, ''La Corte costituzionale ancora irrisolta sul ricorso delle minoranze parlamentari (ord. n. 17/2019)'', Forum di Quaderni costituzionali, 13 febbraio 2019].</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Parliamentary procedure
(section)
Add topic