Editing Naked singularity (section)

==Cosmic censorship hypothesis==
{{Main|Cosmic censorship hypothesis}}
The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that every gravitational singularity will remain hidden by its event horizon. [[LIGO]] events, including [[GW150914]], are consistent with these predictions.  Although data anomalies would have resulted in the case of a singularity, the nature of those anomalies remains unknown.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Pretorius|first=Frans|date=2016-05-31|title=Viewpoint: Relativity Gets Thorough Vetting from LIGO|url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/52|journal=Physics|language=en|volume=9|page=52 |doi=10.1103/Physics.9.52|doi-access=free}}</ref>

Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature,<ref>M. Bojowald, [http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ ''Living Rev. Rel.'' 8, (2005), 11] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151221011231/http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ |date=2015-12-21 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | title=Spherical gravitational collapse in N dimensions | journal=Physical Review D | volume=76 | issue=8 | date=2007-10-22 | issn=1550-7998 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.76.084026 | page=084026|arxiv=gr-qc/0608136| bibcode=2007PhRvD..76h4026G | s2cid=119441682 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | last3=Singh | first3=Parampreet | title=Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity | journal=Physical Review Letters | volume=96 | issue=3 | date=2006-01-27 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.96.031302 | page=031302| pmid=16486681 |arxiv=gr-qc/0506129| bibcode=2006PhRvL..96c1302G | s2cid=19851285 }}</ref> implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold. Numerical calculations<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Eardley | first1=Douglas M. | last2=Smarr | first2=Larry | title=Time functions in numerical relativity: Marginally bound dust collapse | journal=Physical Review D | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=19 | issue=8 | date=1979-04-15 | issn=0556-2821 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.19.2239 | pages=2239–2259| bibcode=1979PhRvD..19.2239E }}</ref> and some other arguments<ref>{{cite journal | last=Królak | first=Andrzej | title=Nature of Singularities in Gravitational Collapse | journal=Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement | volume=136 | year=1999 | issn=0375-9687 | doi=10.1143/ptps.136.45 | pages=45–56| arxiv=gr-qc/9910108 | bibcode=1999PThPS.136...45K |doi-access=free}}</ref> have also hinted at this possibility.