Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Marbury v. Madison
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Marbury's legal remedy=== Turning to the second question, the Court said that the law provided Marbury a remedy for Madison's unlawful withholding of his commission. Marshall wrote that "it is a general and indisputable rule, that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law, whenever that right is invaded." This rule derives from the ancient Roman legal maxim {{lang|la|ubi jus, ibi remedium}} ("where there is a legal right, there is a legal remedy"), which was well established in the English [[common law]].{{sfnp|Amar|1989|p=447}}{{sfnp|Amar|1987|pp=1485β86}} In what the American legal scholar [[Akhil Reed Amar]] called "one of the most important and inspiring passages" of the opinion,{{sfnp|Amar|1987|p=1486}} Marshall wrote: {{Blockquote |text=The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. |source=''Marbury'', 5 U.S. at 163. }} The Court then confirmed that a [[mandamus|writ of mandamus]]{{mdash}}a type of court order that commands a government official to perform an act his official duties legally require him to perform{{mdash}}was the proper remedy for Marbury's situation.{{sfnp|Brest|Levinson|Balkin|Amar|2018|pp=124β25}} But this raised the issue of whether the Court, which was part of the judicial branch of the government, had the power to command Madison, who as secretary of state was part of the executive branch of the government.{{sfnp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=Β§ 2.2.1, p. 41}} The Court held that so long as the remedy involved a mandatory duty to a specific person and not a political matter left to discretion, the courts could provide the legal remedy.{{sfnp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=Β§ 2.2.1, pp. 42β43}} Borrowing a phrase John Adams had drafted in 1779 for the [[Constitution of Massachusetts|Massachusetts State Constitution]], Marshall wrote: "The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men."<ref>{{harvp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=Β§ 2.2.1, p. 41}}, quoting ''Marbury'', 5 U.S. at 163.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Marbury v. Madison
(section)
Add topic