Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Lucretius
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Natural philosophy== Lucretius was an early thinker in what grew to become the study of [[evolution]]. He believed that nature experiments endlessly across the aeons, and the organisms that adapt best to their environment have the best chance of surviving. Living organisms survived because of the commensurate relationship between their strength, speed, or intellect and the external dynamics of their environment. Prior to [[Charles Darwin]]'s 1859 publication of ''[[On the Origin of Species]]'', the natural philosophy of Lucretius typified one of the foremost non-[[Teleology|teleological]] and mechanistic accounts of the creation and evolution of life.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Campbell|first=Gordon|title=Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772-1104|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2003|isbn=0199263965|location=Oxford/New York|pages=3β6}}</ref> In contrast to modern thought on the subject, he did not believe that new species evolved from previously existing ones. Lucretius challenged the assumption that humans are necessarily superior to animals, noting that mammalian mothers in the wild recognize and nurture their offspring as do human mothers.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Massaro|first=Alma|date=2014-11-11|title=The Living in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Animals' ataraxia and Humans' Distress|url=https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/672|journal=Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism|language=en|volume=2|issue=2|pages=45β58|doi=10.7358/rela-2014-002-mass|issn=2280-9643|doi-access=free}}</ref> While [[Epicurus]] left open the possibility for [[free will]] by arguing for the [[Brownian motion|uncertainty of the paths of atoms]], Lucretius viewed the soul or mind as emerging from fortuitous arrangements of distinct particles.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gillispie |first=Charles Coulston |author-link=Charles Coulston Gillispie |title=The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas |orig-year=1960 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=0-691-02350-6 |page=[https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 98] |url=https://archive.org/details/edgeofobjectivit00char/page/98 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Lucretius
(section)
Add topic