Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Interactive proof system
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Arthur–Merlin and Merlin–Arthur protocols === {{main|Arthur–Merlin protocol}} Although NP may be viewed as using interaction, it wasn't until 1985 that the concept of computation through interaction was conceived (in the context of complexity theory) by two independent groups of researchers. One approach, by [[László Babai]], who published "Trading group theory for randomness",<ref>László Babai. [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=22192 Trading group theory for randomness]. ''Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing'', ACM. 1985.</ref> defined the ''Arthur–Merlin'' ('''AM''') class hierarchy. In this presentation, Arthur (the verifier) is a [[probabilistic Turing machine|probabilistic]], polynomial-time machine, while Merlin (the prover) has unbounded resources. The class '''MA''' in particular is a simple generalization of the NP interaction above in which the verifier is probabilistic instead of deterministic. Also, instead of requiring that the verifier always accept valid certificates and reject invalid certificates, it is more lenient: * '''Completeness:''' if the string is in the language, the prover must be able to give a certificate such that the verifier will accept with probability at least 2/3 (depending on the verifier's random choices). * '''Soundness:''' if the string is not in the language, no prover, however malicious, will be able to convince the verifier to accept the string with probability exceeding 1/3. This machine is potentially more powerful than an ordinary NP [[interaction protocol]], and the certificates are no less practical to verify, since '''BPP''' algorithms are considered as abstracting practical computation (see [[Bounded-error probabilistic polynomial|BPP]]).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Interactive proof system
(section)
Add topic