Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Institute for Historical Review
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Criticism of methods== The "Holocaust revisionist" arguments published by the IHR are not regarded as serious historical research by mainstream historians and academics; rather, they are regarded as works of [[pseudo-science]] aimed at proving that the Holocaust did not happen. The editorial board of one of the leading historical journals, ''[[The Journal of American History]]'', wrote, "We all abhor, on both moral and scholarly grounds, the substantive arguments of the Institute for Historical Review. We reject their claims to be taken seriously as historians."<ref>''[[Journal of American History]]'', Vol 80, No. 3, p. 1213.</ref> In response, IHR printed Weber's letter disputing the claims.<ref>Weber, Mark. ''[http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p20_weber.html The Organization of American Historians: Faithfully Reflecting Prevailing Standards] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150915041250/http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p20_weber.html |date=September 15, 2015 }}''. The Journal of Historical Review, July–August 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 4), pp. 20-24.</ref> In April 2004, following a complaint by the [[David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies]], ''[[The Nation (U.S. periodical)|The Nation]]'' magazine refused to accept advertising from the IHR, stating "[T]here is a strong presumption against censoring any advertisement, especially if we disagree with its politics. This case, however, is different. Their arguments are 'patently fraudulent.{{'"}}<ref>[http://www.wymaninstitute.org/press/2004-04-22.php www.wymaninstitute.org David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, 22 April 2004] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051103063820/http://www.wymaninstitute.org/press/2004-04-22.php |date=November 3, 2005 }}</ref> Weber responded with critical commentary in a letter to Leigh Novog of the advertising department of ''The Nation''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ihr.org/news/040428_nation_letter.shtml|title=IHR Letter to The Nation|access-date=November 22, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304123206/http://www.ihr.org/news/040428_nation_letter.shtml|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Institute for Historical Review
(section)
Add topic