Editing In Flanders Fields (section)

==Popularity==
[[File:If Ye Break Faith - Victory bonds poster.jpg|thumb|right|Aspects of the poem were used in propaganda, such as this Canadian war bonds poster|alt=Painting of a soldier staring down at a white cross surrounded by red poppies. The text "If ye break faith ~ we shall not sleep" and "Buy Victory Bonds" are written at the top and bottom respectively.]]

According to historian [[Paul Fussell]], "In Flanders Fields" was the most popular poem of its era.<ref name="Fussell315" /> McCrae received numerous letters and telegrams praising his work when he was revealed as the author.<ref name="NYTimes1938">{{citation |last=Ragner |first=Bernhard |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1938/01/30/archives/a-tribute-in-flanders-fields-john-mccrae-author-of-the-perfect-war.html |title=A tribute in Flanders Fields |work=[[The New York Times]] Magazine |date=1938-01-30 |access-date=2012-02-07 |page=14}}</ref> The poem was republished throughout the world, rapidly becoming synonymous with the sacrifice of the soldiers who died in the First World War.<ref name="NYT1921">{{citation |url=https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0717F93E5D14738DDDA10994DA415B818EF1D3 |title=In Flanders Fields |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=1921-12-18 |access-date=2012-02-07}}</ref> It was translated into numerous languages, so many that McCrae himself quipped that "it needs only Chinese now, surely".<ref>{{harvnb|Bassett|1984|p=50}}</ref> Its appeal was nearly universal. Soldiers took encouragement from it as a statement of their duty to those who died while people on the home front viewed it as defining the cause for which their brothers and sons were fighting.<ref>{{harvnb|Bassett|1984|p=49}}</ref>

It was often used for propaganda, particularly in Canada by the [[Unionist Party (Canada)|Unionist Party]] during the [[1917 Canadian federal election|1917 federal election]] amidst the [[Conscription Crisis of 1917|Conscription Crisis]]. [[French Canadian]]s in Quebec were strongly opposed to the possibility of [[conscription]] but [[English Canadian]]s voted overwhelmingly to support Prime Minister [[Robert Borden]] and the Unionist government. "In Flanders Fields" was said to have done more to "make this Dominion persevere in the duty of fighting for the world's ultimate peace than all the political speeches of the recent campaign".<ref name="Prescott125">{{harvnb|Prescott|1985|p=125}}</ref> McCrae, a staunch supporter of the empire and the war effort, was pleased with the effect his poem had on the election. He stated in a letter: "I hope I stabbed a [French] Canadian with my vote".<ref name="Prescott125" />

The poem was a popular motivational tool in Great Britain, where it was used to encourage soldiers fighting against Germany, and in the United States where it was reprinted across the country. It was one of the most quoted works during the war,<ref name="Prescott105">{{harvnb|Prescott|1985|pp=105–106}}</ref> used in many places as part of campaigns to sell [[war bond]]s, during recruiting efforts and to criticize [[pacifism|pacifists]] and those who sought to profit from the war.<ref name="Prescott133">{{harvnb|Prescott|1985|p=133}}</ref> At least 55 composers in the United States set the poem "In Flanders Fields" to music by 1920, including [[Charles Ives]], [[Arthur Foote]], and [[John Philip Sousa]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ward |first1=Jennifer A. |title=American Musical Settings of "In Flanders Fields" and the Great War |journal=Journal of Musicological Research |date=13 March 2014 |volume=33 |issue=1–3 |pages=96–129 |doi=10.1080/01411896.2014.878566 |s2cid=161990222 |ref=Ward 2014}}</ref> The setting by Ives, which premiered in early 1917, is perhaps the earliest American setting.<ref>{{citation |url=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.200035609/default.html |title=In Flanders Fields (Song Collection) |publisher=Library of Congress |access-date=2012-02-20}}</ref> Fussell criticized the poem in his work ''The Great War and Modern Memory'' (1975).<ref name="Fussell315">{{harvnb|Fussell|2009|p=315}}</ref> He noted the distinction between the [[pastoral]] tone of the first nine lines and the "recruiting-poster rhetoric" of the third stanza. Describing it as "vicious" and "stupid", Fussell called the final lines a "propaganda argument against a negotiated peace".<ref>{{harvnb|Fussell|2009|pp=314–315}}</ref>